View Full Version : Some macro shots - not one for bug haters!
Some from this week! :)
http://www.statichiss.co.uk/CRW_8201s.jpg
http://www.statichiss.co.uk/CRW_8150s.jpg
http://www.statichiss.co.uk/CRW_8124s.jpg
http://www.statichiss.co.uk/CRW_8112s.jpg
http://www.statichiss.co.uk/CRW_8129s.jpg
http://www.statichiss.co.uk/CRW_8163s.jpg
http://www.statichiss.co.uk/CRW_8154s.jpg
http://www.statichiss.co.uk/CRW_8113s.jpg
http://www.statichiss.co.uk/CRW_8128s.jpg
All taken with my Sigma 105mm Macro and 430EX. For some (Definitely the ant shot, not sure about some of the others) I used stacked Kenko extension tubes.
This was physically the most demanding 'shoot' I have ever done - the heat / humidity was almost unbearable and my clothes were wringing wet afterwards!
Fantastic. Usually when I even think about taking a picture of a butterfly they just fly off. I do have a few pics to process but they're nowhere near as detailed as those. I did once get a fantastic shot of a crane fly that was so dopey it couldn't be bothered to move and just sat there for 10 minutes posing while I shoved a camera up it's backside, but that was a very rare exception. :D
I just wish I could take photographs even one tenth as good as some of those I see here and the other place. :(
Stan_Lite
29-07-2006, 06:10
Truly stunning shots Durz - the detail is fantastic :cool: (love the ant shot).
Thank you for sharing your talent with us :)
Stan :)
http://www.statichiss.co.uk/CRW_8160s.jpg
http://www.statichiss.co.uk/CRW_8131s.jpg
A couple more that I forgot to upload :)
number 7 is amazing - they all are - but that one 'talks' to me :)
Thanks :)
It's about the enjoyment you get taking the photos as much as the end result. Keep plugging at it and I'm sure you will/do take pictures every bit as good :)
Absolutely. Having the "right" kit only goes so far. I only picked up a camera in anger for the first time ever just over a year ago! Its all about the practice you get and how hard you work to learn all the parameters at first, then getting the shots comes a bit easier :)
Being exceptionally critical and not being afraid to bin shots that you arent happy with helps an awful lot too :)
OK, maybe you're right, to a point. I can do ninja, sometimes.
http://www.ouroboros.me.uk/img/06/07/mothra.jpg
Found this attached to a wall last night (so no context, sorry). Closest camera to hand was the compact, which I seem to be more successful with than the big thing I've got as well. Didn't have time to fiddle, so left it full auto and ninja'd. The poor sod took a faceful of flash and flopped around like it had been on way too much alcohol. :eek: :D
I can fully understand people having phobias after seeing that face. Definitely not one I'd want to see up close on a lonely, dark night. Consider the flashbulb as revenge if you will. :D
Do you ever sell your photographs? You could make a packet I reckon.
Some amazing shots there - truly awesome.
Do you always use black borders on your shots? If so, why?
I think I prefer the butterfly shot without the border, but I can't put my finger on the reason right now.
I agree that the snake one is my favourite :). Where were they taken?
Its not a snake ;)
I tend to put a border on my shots yes, because almost always they look incomplete without some kind of framing. Its a psychological thing. They arent always black but they are almost always block colours so as not to be distracting :)
They were taken at a place called Butterfly World which is next to Dobbies garden centre. The falconry thing there had been moved to some castle health spa type thing somewhere else, which was a bit annoying :(
@Will - as macro shots go, those ones are "easy"/average to take. Nobody buys shots like that really, and there is certainly no way I am anywhere near good enough to go professional. Think of it like Gilly and bowling, its that sort of perspective :)
Who's Freefaller?! :p
Well to me they look like amazing shots - much better than some of the things I've seen in magazines . :)
Whoops, im so used to translating you in my head to Will and then back again to *that* to post that it happened accidentally and totally subconsciously too.
Thanks for the comments too :) Much appreciated :)
Stunning pics, any chance of some copies that aren't shrunk via jpeg? Mainly for my own curiousity to see how much of a difference the shrinking makes to the pics :) The last two really grab me I must say.
Did you learn the basics yourself or did you go to a class or something?
I dont generally release full-res images on the net. I could do you a 100% crop though if you wanted to see how detailed the shots are at full res.
I didnt go to a class or anything I just forced myself to not use the auto modes and taught myself.
Blackstar
31-07-2006, 11:58
*buys turtles*
Leonardo, Michelangelo, Raphael and Donatello.
I love those little guys, am planning to go back to Dobbies to look into how big they get etc.
I dont generally release full-res images on the net. I could do you a 100% crop though if you wanted to see how detailed the shots are at full res.
I didnt go to a class or anything I just forced myself to not use the auto modes and taught myself.
Sure, I was just curious as to how much the jpeq actually knocks off the image quality. Purely to satisfy my nerdy curiousity :)
http://www.statichiss.co.uk/CRW_8128crop.jpg
Thats a 100% crop, as little JPEG compression as possible (I go straight from RAW to JPEG you see, so my whole workflow is in jpeg...)
Thankyou, curiousity satisfied :D That gives me an idea of just _how_ good that camera and shot is :) The detail really is something else
Another 100% crop for you.
http://www.statichiss.co.uk/CRW_8131crop.jpg
Its "only" 6.3MP so the resolution is a bit limited. Ideally for this stuff I would be after 8 or more but its just more and more money!! A 1DmkIIn is my ideal camera - the detail they are capable of is stunning!
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.