new sig

[Admiral Huddy]

Too big?? :confused:

[BBx]

Yes.

n00b :p

BB x

[Admiral Huddy]

Ahh I can't get it down!

[Goose]

I don't think the problem lies with the sig being too big, it just makes the text a little insignificant.

[Admiral Huddy]

smaller text?

[Goose]

I mean, your post itself. I'm doing a cr@p job at explaining it.

Take your first post in this thread. The "Too big??:confused:" bit is squashed into the corner.

It's all 'imho' of course. The sig itself is good stuff.

[Admiral Huddy]

I'm crap at creating sigs :(

[Justsomebloke]

Oooooo A Nublet with a Sig :p

[Goose]

My critisismsmn wasn't aimed at the design of the sig, more of the impact it has on your actual post.

Edit: I feel bad now. Scrub my posts, it's a great sig.

[Mark]

It is a great sig, but what Goose was trying to say is that big signatures tend to dominate the posts they're attached to. The theory goes that posts are supposed to be about their content, not the signature at the bottom. All IMHO of course.

Doesn't overly worry me anyway as I have sigs (and avatars) turned off so I can browse in relative safety at work.

[rich99]

Doesn't overly worry me anyway as I have sigs (and avatars) turned off so I can browse in relative safety at work.

ahhh that's a shame! You're missing out on my wonderful creativity :'( ;)

Siggy looks fine to me - it is a little large but then I'm sure people are usually paying extra attention when reading a Huddy post anyway, plus most of your classic posts are a good bit longer than that sig ;D