PDA

View Full Version : Taking photographs in complete darkness?


SidewinderINC
14-04-2008, 18:23
OK, now I know the answer is "use a flash" but I'm after some more information on taking indoor pictures that will come out well / not looking like a flash was obviously used (if that makes sense) in complete darkness.

I don't have a flashgun yet, so will have to invest in one definitely.

Is there anything else that would be essential other than a flash for stuff like this?


Cheers

Matt :)

petemc
14-04-2008, 18:33
Up the ISO. Get a faster lens, like f/2.8 or f/1.4. Shoot near the windows too.

SidewinderINC
14-04-2008, 18:41
well the Sigma 2.8 that I spoke with you about will be my lens at the time (can't afford the L glass and wouldn't want to risk taking it where I'll be shooting anyway)

Near windows might be an issue, but I can probably shoot in the direction of windows :p


/secretive mode/

Chuckles
14-04-2008, 19:11
If you don't want to make it look like a flash was used, get a defuser as well ;)

The other alternative of course is a tripod and long exposure :p

Mondo
14-04-2008, 19:23
bounce it off a ceiling, wall, someone, just don't fire it directly at the subject as it's not natural. Just think, your eye balls don't emit light do that? :p

SidewinderINC
14-04-2008, 19:25
If you don't want to make it look like a flash was used, get a defuser as well ;)

The other alternative of course is a tripod and long exposure :p

How good are monopods?

Want to be travelling light/compact.

vix
14-04-2008, 19:30
well the Sigma 2.8 that I spoke with you about will be my lens at the time (can't afford the L glass and wouldn't want to risk taking it where I'll be shooting anyway)

Near windows might be an issue, but I can probably shoot in the direction of windows :p


/secretive mode/

I smell urbex......

Even if that's not the case, a lot of urbexers shoot in complete darkness and use long exposures coupled with light painting using torches to show the detail.

SidewinderINC
14-04-2008, 20:27
My My miss Vix.. I bet you can smell a rat from a mile away too :p

Tak
15-04-2008, 07:16
My My miss Vix.. I bet you can smell a rat from a mile away too :p

They don't smell :p

SidewinderINC
15-04-2008, 07:43
They don't smell :p

My point exactly!!!

Mondo
15-04-2008, 09:03
How good are monopods?

Want to be travelling light/compact.

Narh.

If its too dark, use a flash or a tripod, just bump up the ISO.

SidewinderINC
15-04-2008, 19:29
Narh.

If its too dark, use a flash or a tripod, just bump up the ISO.

Right, can people spec me a compact tripod then :D Not too pricey, but obviously sturdy enough :p

I'm after a tripod anyways, but will see if I can borrow a flashgun for the trip.

Jonny69
16-04-2008, 22:38
Get a faster lens, like f/2.8 or f/1.4. Shoot near the windows too.
What does that actually mean? Does that mean it can run a wide aperture at high shutter speeds? Useful in low light conditions right, because it can get a lot more light in, in less time?

On a tripod for example you could just set the aperture as low as it goes and hold the shutter open on the bulb. Same thing?

petemc
16-04-2008, 22:44
Basically the smaller the number the more light it'll let in. If memory serves the addition of 1 stop lets in twice as much light. You could put it on a tripod and do a long exposure. If you're looking to capture the detail in an empty room thats probably a better thing to do. f/8, long exposure.

divine
17-04-2008, 01:30
Yes, a stop difference is either half/double depending on which way you go.

That applies to Aperture, Shutter Speeds and ISO.

Pickers
17-04-2008, 08:06
I smell urbex......


my first thought too :p

SidewinderINC
19-04-2008, 15:31
Just picked up a nifty fifty from TP for... fifty :p

That should be fast enough, just need a pod now.

Tysonator
26-04-2008, 07:42
The sigma 17-70mm F2.8 - F4.5 DC MArco lens is pretty good for low light.
I use a Slick Tri Pod, got for about £35. It is light and compact, I will get you the model number if you wish to check it out ?