![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Chump!!!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North West
Posts: 993
|
![]()
In XP how does the OS prevent mutual access to critical resources? It's a question on my mock paper and I can't seem to find a definate answer.
(a)One of the main issues in multi-tasking operating systems relates to the prevention of mutual access to a critical resource. How, in practice, can this be achieved |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Bananaman
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Liverpool/Edinburgh
Posts: 4,817
|
![]()
I've got no idea, but if i had to answer it, i'd go down the line of something to do with Interrupt requests etc...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
![]()
Ah, inter-process/inter-thread synchronisation. Fun (and generally evil) stuff.
Do some google research on 'mutex' and 'semaphore' (the latter in computer use, not old-style signalling use). That should get you a good start. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Chump!!!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North West
Posts: 993
|
![]()
I made some notes about Locks. Phone something on Semaphores as well.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
The Stig
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swad!
Posts: 10,713
|
![]()
How do they define 'critical resources'?
__________________
apt-get moo |
![]() |
![]() |