|
28-05-2010, 08:17 | #1 |
Vodka Martini
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 786
|
Honda CR-Z
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2010/05...ar_honda_cr_z/
I quite like the look of this, but 9.9 to 60mph isn't exactly sporty... Still, a combined 56.5mpg and 0 road tax isn't to be sniffed at. Shame there isn't a "proper" engine option... |
28-05-2010, 13:34 | #2 |
Baby Bore
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 9,770
|
If I squint really hard it looks like a MKII CRX, which is a good thing
MB |
28-05-2010, 15:00 | #3 |
The Last Airbender
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pigmopad
Posts: 11,915
|
Have to say that is a nice looking car
__________________
|
28-05-2010, 15:58 | #4 |
Rocket Fuel
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,826
|
I think the front end looks fantastic, very Nissan GTR-esque.
I wonder if there is finally a hybrid that drives well as I know that the Prius is a hideous sack of crap to drive. |
29-05-2010, 02:08 | #5 |
Dirteh Kitteh
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hiding out in Mormon Country
Posts: 1,629
|
Something I just don't understand about all the hybrids out there. Why is there not a single one of them running a Diesel as the dino powered part? Locomotives have been Diesel-electric hybrids for almost a half a century now.
And considering where an electric motor is most efficient is at low speeds and where a Diesel is most efficient is at high speeds, they compliment each other. Use the electric side in town and the Diesel on the highway. A gasoline engine is only efficient when it's warmed up all the way and is used at a constant power setting. Which a car never does.
__________________
A bullet may have your name on it, but shrapnel is addressed "to whom it may concern". |
29-05-2010, 08:34 | #6 |
Rocket Fuel
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,826
|
|
29-05-2010, 13:48 | #7 | |
Absinthe
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 2,539
|
Quote:
I'm speculating here but I suspect your experience is with lorry (truck) diesel engines and these are very different beasts to the engines fitted to European diesel cars. Last edited by Del Lardo; 29-05-2010 at 13:50. |
|
30-05-2010, 23:04 | #8 | |
Noob
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Socialist Republik of Kent
Posts: 5,032
|
Quote:
Some (fairly lame) reasons I came up with: -Easier to crank a petrol engine which would make a smoother transfer from motor to engine when it starts. -A cold diesel needs to warm its glowplugs before it will fire into life. A petrol will just start. -Black smoke when a cold diesel starts, which you don't get with a petrol. You'd need some big ass soot traps to contain it long term. I don't think weight is the issue. Diesels don't weigh that much more than petrols in the grand scale of things. Hybrid batteries weigh about 50kg, which hardly registers on a 1300kg car. I wondered if they are just holding the technology back so they can release a 'next generation' hybrid at some point. That way they maintain a trick up their sleeve rather than unleashing all the technology at once.
__________________
|
|
31-05-2010, 07:45 | #9 |
Stan, Stan the FLASHER MAN!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In bed with your sister
Posts: 5,483
|
Aesthetically, it's not my cup of tea. Any similarity to the Nissan GTR (can't see it personally) isn't much to brag about either. There's one a couple of streets away that I walk past regularly and, every time I look at it, I can't help thinking they overdid the steroids.
I'm not convinced hybrid cars are as green as the manufacturers would like us to think they are. I'm concerned that developing these engines is slowing down R&D on, what I consider to be the proper future of green motoring, the Hydrogen fuel cell.
__________________
Just because I have a short attention span doesn't mean I... |
31-05-2010, 09:53 | #10 | |
Rocket Fuel
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,826
|
Quote:
I don't doubt that the amount of pollution coming out the arse of a Prius is less than a non-hybrid but over the course of the manufacturing process I firmly believe that the Prius is more damaging. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|