|
24-10-2008, 20:25 | #1 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,023
|
Any Bravia owners here?
Tempted by the £599 deal at Comet for the KDL40V4000 but not sure what this set is like, particularly with an HTPC and don't want to leap before I look. The W4000 can be had for another £150-ish and don't know whether it's worth the extra.
Anyone here got any of the Bravia range and can share their experiences?
__________________
|
24-10-2008, 21:01 | #2 |
Chef extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Infinite Loop
Posts: 11,143
|
Best place I can suggest is avforums.com have a search on there and you'll find a section on LCD tvs and you can search for that model on there
__________________
"Dr Sheldon Cooper FTW!" |
24-10-2008, 22:02 | #3 | |
Long Island Iced Tea
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 442
|
Quote:
The W and V are newer models than mine so I would think they are even better screens. |
|
25-10-2008, 00:01 | #4 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Sony have always had issues with black levels, but the Bravia range was a huge improvement on their previous generation (which, if you find, you should touch with a bargepole - right in the middle of the screen, hard).
|
25-10-2008, 00:06 | #5 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 3,201
|
LCD can't match Plasma for black levels and IMO overall picture quality. FullHD sets will be 1920x1080 on either tech so given the choice, i'd be taking the Plasma every time.
Previously, the only two real advantages LCD had as a tech were better PC compatibility and lower power consumption. Now it just has the power consumption to its name IMO.
__________________
|
25-10-2008, 00:18 | #6 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,023
|
Well I was originally looking at plasma but I'm now erring towards LCD, partly because the tech has caught up a lot with plasma but mainly because it'll be used for console gaming and I'm petrified of burn-in on a plasma. This is one thing that plasmas still suffer from but which LCDs don't.
The other thing LCD has going for it is price. £599 for a 40" full HD panel is a stonking deal, surely?
__________________
|
25-10-2008, 00:25 | #7 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 3,201
|
Burn in really isn't half as much of an issue on modern plasmas as it was even as recently as 18 months back, and LCD can suffer from burn in too, my Samsung LCD monitor will attest to that if I accidentally leave it on when I go out for a weekend and the power saving doesn't turn it off
The price is only cheaper because they're not as good
__________________
|
25-10-2008, 00:46 | #8 |
Chef extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Infinite Loop
Posts: 11,143
|
Our 42" 720P Panasonic plasma cost us just over £600 and has no problem with burn in if treated correctly and image retention is ok too if you take care of the screen
Picture looks top notch though
__________________
"Dr Sheldon Cooper FTW!" |
25-10-2008, 01:19 | #9 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Even my old plasma doesn't have a major problem, though I admit I don't use it nearly as much as I probably should given how much I paid (I got done, but never mind that). Simple precautions - don't wind up the brightness too high, and don't leave static images on the screen for hours.
I do get some image retention but that's easily cleared by playing something fast moving (action scene, sports etc.) |
25-10-2008, 09:37 | #10 |
Chef extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Infinite Loop
Posts: 11,143
|
To combat any image retention problems I always put a TV channel on with static for a couple of minutes before the TV goes off.
__________________
"Dr Sheldon Cooper FTW!" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|