|
22-04-2009, 12:58 | #1 |
Goes up to 11!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,577
|
Budget 2009
The car scrapping scheme has been confirmed, just saw it.
• Economy forecast to shrink 3.5% in 2009 So, the worst since WW2? Spin that! Net Debt currently 59% deficit in GDP. Gradually increasing to 79% by 2014. Live feed http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8010759.stm Overview http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8011882.stm 50% tax over £100k earners. Like they don't know loopholes Last edited by Zirax; 22-04-2009 at 13:01. |
22-04-2009, 13:02 | #2 |
Goes up to 11!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,577
|
Feckers
Beer 2% midnight fags 2% 6pm Fuel duty 2p sept, 1p each budget going forward |
22-04-2009, 13:06 | #3 |
The Last Airbender
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pigmopad
Posts: 11,915
|
The usual suspects always come out of the bag
__________________
|
22-04-2009, 13:10 | #4 |
iCustom User Title
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,250
|
I've always supported a taxation on booze and fags to be fair, raising them by 2% is fine by me. The more people quit/cut down on them both, the better the health of the nation in general and less strain on the NHS. Same with junk food, if the UK really is in an obesity epedemic talking to people in a language almost every understands (money) will push the message home that obesity related diseases and illnesses put unncessary strain on the health and benefit services that could be lessened with simple moderation.
Looking to see what he conjures up for savers. People being smart with their money are receiving no reward or incentive to keep doing so. Lack of proper savings across the nation will impact the next generations where current generations have nothing to pass on apart from debt, or, — as thought it's an acomplishment — no debt.
__________________
|
22-04-2009, 13:15 | #5 | |
Moonshine
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 3,201
|
Quote:
Surely they don't want to encourage people to hoard their money at the moment, they want them out there spending it? Problems arise when people spend money they don't actually have, on the assumption they will have it later.
__________________
|
|
22-04-2009, 13:22 | #6 | |
iCustom User Title
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,250
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
22-04-2009, 13:14 | #7 |
The Last Airbender
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pigmopad
Posts: 11,915
|
Oh aye, I'm not totally against taxing beer and fags, bit it's just the same old thing year after year.
__________________
|
22-04-2009, 13:15 | #8 |
Goes up to 11!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,577
|
Going bananas on spending on cutting carbon emissions, renewable energy, homes. Not got all of it but it's at least 2bn.
Just bloody build nuclear :/ |
22-04-2009, 13:17 | #9 |
ex SAS
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: JO01ou
Posts: 10,062
|
__________________
|
22-04-2009, 13:27 | #10 |
iCustom User Title
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,250
|
I watched a documentary on iPlayer not long ago about the future of energy and according to that and some very respected Nuclear experts it's simply incapable of catching up with the demand. The figures just didn't add up. The time it takes for a plant to be built, and its lifespan etc, it fell short of the country's current power demands, never mind the future demands. Renewable energy such as wind and solar power was also dismissed as nothing but a minor contributor.
Fusion power seems to be the future. The first experimental reactor has been built and under heavy testing. They're hoping to harness the power properly within 20 years. By the sounds of it Fusion power stations would outperform Nuclear many times over, and best of all, is completely clean. For those interested, read up on it. In a nut shell it's harnessing the same energy created by the sun.
__________________
Last edited by iCraig; 22-04-2009 at 13:30. |