|
25-08-2009, 16:09 | #1 |
Deep Throat
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,512
|
Stupid ponders...
I'm not really thinking straight at the moment but there's something that's annoying me.
Can ducks suck? They kind of... what I would call kerwaffle if I had to name it... yeh. They kerwaffle the water and things. But like can they suck? And what about blowing? If you put a candle infront of a duck could it blow it out? I'm being serious too! I'm really confused and need to know! Please feel free to add more stupid ponders that need answering so I don't feel so silly! |
25-08-2009, 16:16 | #2 |
iCustom User Title
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,250
|
Well, ducks respire in a similiar fashion to us but I don't think they have the capacity to manipulate air in the same way we do. We use our mouths, lips and even tongue to force air into a distinct "blow" and "suck". So, no, I think they can't.
__________________
|
26-08-2009, 00:36 | #3 |
Dubious
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northampton
Posts: 1,571
|
It's actually our lungs that do the "sucking" and "blowing" by expanding/contracting. Expanding creates a bigger capacity which needs to be filled... which is done by "sucking" air in through our mouth
__________________
Look at your signature, now back to mine, now back to yours, now back to mine.
Sadly, yours isn't mine. But if you stopped writing about other things and made this your signature, yours could be like mine. Look down, back up. Where are you? You're on Boat Drinks, reading the signature your signature could be like. I'm on a computer. |
27-08-2009, 15:27 | #4 | |
Absinthe
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 2,692
|
Quote:
Respiration is not to be confused with breathing. Respiration is a chemical reaction within living cells in order to release energy and therefore is the same in all organisms. It is not the processes of in/exhalation or gas exchange. The confusion arises probably because of "artificial respiration" and other misleading use of the term. I'm sorry Oh, and ducks don't "blow".. Actually, there's an MP3 of Donald duck being given a...erm.. <ahem> (maybe by Daisy Duck) now I think of it, from an American chat show |
|
25-08-2009, 16:29 | #5 |
The Mouse King of Denmark
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,476
|
I reckon if you squeezed a duck hard enough and quickly enough it would produce a big enough exhalation to blow a flame out. The noise would be comical too.
__________________
|
25-08-2009, 23:20 | #6 | |
Rocket Fuel
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Adrift in the Orca
Posts: 6,845
|
Quote:
Mind you, bagpipes sound like cats being squeezed anyway.
__________________
We must move forward not backward, upwards not forward, and always twirling, twirling, twirling... |
|
25-08-2009, 16:47 | #7 |
The Last Airbender
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pigmopad
Posts: 11,915
|
A bit like a "quackooooppphhhh!!!!"
__________________
|
25-08-2009, 17:13 | #8 |
Long Island Iced Tea
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 488
|
I think if you had a reeeally small candle then the duck could blow it out, but otherwise no!
|
25-08-2009, 17:16 | #9 |
The Last Airbender
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pigmopad
Posts: 11,915
|
How about if you had a really big duck?
__________________
|
25-08-2009, 17:17 | #10 |
Preparing more tumbleweed
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,038
|
I wouldn't want to squeeze it. I might be daft at times but I'm not completely quackers.
__________________
Mal: Define "interesting"? Wash: "Oh, God, oh, God, we're all gonna die"? |