13-10-2007, 18:09 | #11 |
Long Island Iced Tea
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 143
|
Yeah I cringe when I see S1 repeats, S3 was great and S4 even better (its been a while, might re-watch them once I've finished next gen off)
It could have lasted 7 seasons easily.
__________________
|
14-10-2007, 11:17 | #12 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nr Liverpewl
Posts: 4,371
|
I found Enterprise to be a bit... boring. S4 did get better and had some nice stories. Since DS9 Trek can't do character development. Voyager. Janeway and Tuvok were meant to be bestest friends, never felt that in the Kirk & Spock way. I need my characters to evolve and grow. Anyways I have doubts over this new film. I also find it funny that its Kirk days. JMS, B5 creator, wrote a long document to Paramount about how to save Star Trek. Basically he said start again. Throw out all the rules, start over. A JMS style Star Trek would have been incredible imho. However they didn't like his ideas. Yet now the film is going back to Kirk, sorta starting again. I know its not a reboot, but its sorta there. I think its very risky. They say the ship design is going to be almost the same. But its over 30 years later, and Enterprise looks more modern than the Enterprise... um.... I can imagine Sylar as Spock though. He does have that look, like he could be a young Spock. I thought MI3 was terrible though, so I have doubts. There was no real plot that I remember. I had no idea why the bad guy wanted the thing Cruise had. I fear for this new trek through the stars. I wish they'd let them do this: http://bztv.typepad.com/newsviews/fi...2004Reboot.pdf
__________________
Thats no hamster, its a space station! |
14-10-2007, 15:59 | #13 |
BBx woz 'ere :P
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,147,487,208
|
Ooooh a star trek film I might actually admit to watching! I don't really know much about the star trek series and films, but even with my limited knowledge the cast seems a little different - it might be quite fun!
__________________
No No! |
14-10-2007, 18:32 | #14 |
Long Island Iced Tea
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 143
|
I think running a few series based on a ship stuck in the alternate reality could have worked, keep it in the voyager/ds9 era to keep things looking similar. (The reality used in TOS, Enterprise and DS9, not so much the one used in Next gen as that was a timeloop that went wrong). Space for new character development and battles!
__________________
|
15-10-2007, 12:54 | #15 | ||
The Mouse King of Denmark
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,476
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
15-10-2007, 13:16 | #16 |
Columbian Coffee
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 84
|
I'm looking forward to seeing how it turns out
Stelly |
15-10-2007, 15:10 | #17 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
|
15-10-2007, 15:18 | #18 |
BBx woz 'ere :P
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,147,487,208
|
Sorry for being a n00b - but what's the odd/even number thing?!
__________________
No No! |
15-10-2007, 15:24 | #19 |
The Stig
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swad!
Posts: 10,713
|
Even numbered Trek films are the good ones (Wrath of Kahn (2) and First Contact (8) being my personal favourites), the odd ones are widely reagrded to be the most pantsest.
The Search for Spock was crap imo
__________________
apt-get moo |
15-10-2007, 15:25 | #20 |
ex SAS
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: JO01ou
Posts: 10,062
|
The Search for Spock was just a filler really.
__________________
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|