20-03-2008, 14:55 | #11 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 3,201
|
If there was money to be had in it, ITV wouldn't have ended the contract though, the fact they have implies the revenue isn't flowing as well as predicted, the advertising isn't supporting the costs etc.
It would seem silly of ITV to dump F1 if it was still making them money considering they're a commercially funded broadcaster. The BBC can show any old crap regardless of ratings and still get the money, ITV can't.
__________________
|
20-03-2008, 15:47 | #12 | |
Preparing more tumbleweed
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,038
|
Quote:
__________________
Mal: Define "interesting"? Wash: "Oh, God, oh, God, we're all gonna die"? |
|
21-03-2008, 00:58 | #14 |
The list is long, but distinguished
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ã…rhus, Denmark
Posts: 1,643
|
Any idea when it's going to be made exciting again?
__________________
|
21-03-2008, 01:41 | #15 |
Preparing more tumbleweed
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,038
|
We were debating about this on a geeks mailing list I'm on. We reckon what they ought to do is say "No rules at all, except that your car must be able to complete the race on an amount of fuel decided on the day, between xx gallons and xx gallons".
Giving the car mfgs free reign could result in some very interesting cars, use of ground effect etc.etc.
__________________
Mal: Define "interesting"? Wash: "Oh, God, oh, God, we're all gonna die"? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|