Boat Drinks  

Go Back   Boat Drinks > General > General Disruption

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-2009, 19:30   #1
Garp
Preparing more tumbleweed
 
Garp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,038
Default Bubbles in space.. or did China fake their space mission?



Kinda interesting viewing. Wonder who they thought they were fooling?

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/chin...walk-5809.html Interview with chinese scientist at NASA.
__________________
Mal: Define "interesting"?
Wash: "Oh, God, oh, God, we're all gonna die"?

Last edited by Garp; 10-02-2009 at 19:33.
Garp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 19:39   #2
Glaucus
Absinthe
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,855
Default

Just like the fake moon landings utter crap. Those "bubles" could easily be water/ice droplets. The flag is a pointless thing.
The lights are interesting, but could be from the space craft.
__________________
Glaucus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 19:43   #3
Justsomebloke
The Night Worker
 
Justsomebloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,228
Default

Not very convincing to be honest & more funny that it looked like the astronaut was Farting & they kept rewinding it
__________________



Justsomebloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 19:44   #4
Garp
Preparing more tumbleweed
 
Garp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AcidHell2 View Post
Just like the fake moon landings utter crap. Those "bubles" could easily be water/ice droplets. The flag is a pointless thing.
The lights are interesting, but could be from the space craft.
Read the linked article.

Why would water particles be released after several minutes of normalised air pressure of the cabin and space? Debris should be released at the start when depressurisation occurs and the doors were opened. Why would the particles be increasing in speed in a zero atmosphere environment? That would imply some form of integrated propulsion. Why would they be increasing in size too?
__________________
Mal: Define "interesting"?
Wash: "Oh, God, oh, God, we're all gonna die"?
Garp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 19:52   #5
Glaucus
Absinthe
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,855
Default

Have nasa released anything?

Things look different in space and many of the things you have said like teh bubles accelerating. Don;t look liek they are to me.

the Clouds and the lack of atmosphere is much more interesting. But still would be nice if nasa released something.

Lack of atmosphere and no clouds. But then it does not look like it was filmed under water either. where the blue hue on everything, if it was filmed under water.
__________________
Glaucus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 23:13   #6
Mondo
Absinthe
 
Mondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,174
Default

It is certainly interesting, the water thing could be anything, what was really interesting was the clouds speed, there is no way to explain that one except the entire video is sped up.
__________________

My Website / MSN / Email / Flickr / Blog
Mondo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 23:53   #7
iCraig
iCustom User Title
 
iCraig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,250
Default

__________________
iCraig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 00:39   #8
Mark
Screaming Orgasm
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
Default

Indeed. Garp, please don't buy into this conspiracy nonsense.

Particles can be released days or even weeks after launch - anything from thruster firings to thermal expansion to an astronaut bumping into a bulkhead can liberate stuff.

One classic example of just how easily the most unexpected things can trigger unusual structural behaviour: IIRC, NASA discovered that one particular astronaut's exercise technique on the on-board equipment was setting up sympathetic oscillations through the structure, leading to the solar arrays bouncing around.
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 01:11   #9
Garp
Preparing more tumbleweed
 
Garp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,038
Default

Okay, so if we ignore the bubbles, still unexplained:

Why did the clouds change so rapidly behind them?

What was going on with the light arrays? Where did the massive multi-light reflected ones disappear?

Why did the flag move in such a bizarre way? I've been pondering that one most. Some silly idiots have commented "no wind in space for the flag to flap".. but ignoring that foolishness, why did it randomly move about so much when the astronaut was holding it? Even when stopped moving it would randomly go in a different direction to before. Would solar wind cause that much movement?

Why is the audio so clear, when previous chinese space missions have had the same problem with background noise as NASA and Russia?

I do want to make it clear: I'm not denying China got a rocket into space, or NASA, or Russia, or any such thing. It's just this spacewalk that doesn't add up.
__________________
Mal: Define "interesting"?
Wash: "Oh, God, oh, God, we're all gonna die"?
Garp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 02:50   #10
Mark
Screaming Orgasm
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
Default

Flags behaving oddly is a conspiracy theorist favourite. The same thing happened with the moon landings - everyone spotted the flag doing odd things and immediately cried foul.

The audio issue is a difficult one too. It is possible to have high quality live audio in space. NASA have done it, but it's a recent innovation (last year or two), and they've only done it from inside the ISS. It also needs a fair chunk of bandwidth which NASA have to ration (China, presumably, wouldn't have this problem as they'd just throw money at it like they did with the Olympics). If the Chinese suits are tethered (as the early US and Russian ones were) then the US technique would work for them too.

Having said that, now I've watched the video (didn't have chance before), the thing that stood out for me was the movement of the earth in the background. That's very odd indeed and I have no explanation.

Of course, the big problem I have is with the agenda. How did we get from pointing out issues with the spacewalk to saying the whole thing was fake?
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:19.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.