02-03-2009, 15:50 | #21 |
I iz speshul
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 6,296
|
It does if my interpretation of the law is correct. MB received a refund for the netbook while they still had it, and when they sent him the netbook back, it could feasibly come under the Unsolicited Goods Act 1971. For the law to come into play, PC World would have to send MB the netbook with the intention of seeking payment for it and for him not to request the item. In that circumstance, Matt could claim ownership of the item as he didn't request it and it would be unlawful of PC World to demand payment for it.
However, as it would appear to be a genuine mistake, PC World could legally argue that they didn't intend to send it to him, so could claim it back or the money back. From a completely legal point of view, because MB knows the item has gotten to him in error, he should contact PC World and tell them to arrange for it to be picked up at their expense and at his convenience. That's legally though. I'm fairly sure I'd keep my gob shut and hope for the best. Whether or not PC World will come calling for the netbook or the money back though is anyone's guess.
__________________
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine as children do. It's not just in some of us; it is in everyone. And as we let our own lights shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others. |
02-03-2009, 15:57 | #22 |
Baby Bore
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 9,770
|
I'll email them If they want the netbook then they can have it, I'm more than happy to give it back
MB |
02-03-2009, 16:02 | #23 |
Vodka Martini
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 833
|
They're fond of "restocking fees" so tell them you'll charge an "unstocking fee"
__________________
|
02-03-2009, 16:05 | #24 |
I iz speshul
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 6,296
|
Just make sure it's at their cost and at your convenience, they made the mistake after all so you do not legally have to put yourself out for them
__________________
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine as children do. It's not just in some of us; it is in everyone. And as we let our own lights shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others. |
02-03-2009, 16:09 | #25 | |
BD Recruitment Officer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Smogville
Posts: 3,880
|
Quote:
Personally I would wait it out and let them contact me, I believe there is a period of time where it's the companies prerogative to contact the customer, not the other way around, after that time has expired, it's finished. |
|
02-03-2009, 16:20 | #26 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 2,345
|
damn i need some good luck like this. :/
ah well. |
02-03-2009, 18:55 | #27 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 3,201
|
Pretty sure this doesn't fall under unsolicted goods act by virtue of the fact you were dealing with them at the time. A mistaken delivery / additional delivery etc. from a company who you have solicited something from, is not covered as unsolicited goods.
That act is purely to stop companies who send you crappy CD collections and stuff on purpose then demand you either pay for them or return them at your cost, an entirely different situation to this. I'm pretty sure they have every right to claim one or the other back and I believe they may well have up to 1 year to do so. If they do not claim back within this time period, you can keep it. It may not be 1 year though, it could be 2 or 5. My memory is shocking for detail
__________________
|
02-03-2009, 18:59 | #28 |
BD Recruitment Officer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Smogville
Posts: 3,880
|
I thought it was 6 months, but that's what I was getting at in my post.
|
02-03-2009, 19:02 | #29 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 3,201
|
I thought it was longer than that, because I remember being shocked at quite long it is they have to pop up and ask for it back.
__________________
|
02-03-2009, 19:53 | #30 |
ex SAS
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: JO01ou
Posts: 10,062
|
I wouldn't, it's an SEP.
__________________
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|