10-04-2009, 21:29 | #21 |
'09 sexual conquests: 4.5
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,075
|
Stinky.
|
10-04-2009, 21:31 | #22 |
ex SAS
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: JO01ou
Posts: 10,062
|
__________________
|
10-04-2009, 21:33 | #23 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,855
|
meh it was ok, so need the canned laughter back.
__________________
|
10-04-2009, 21:34 | #24 |
Crispy Coated
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 2,087
|
It was never canned laughter, it was all live.
__________________
|
10-04-2009, 21:34 | #25 |
'09 sexual conquests: 4.5
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,075
|
|
10-04-2009, 21:35 | #26 |
'09 sexual conquests: 4.5
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,075
|
Without the canned LOLs it was just full of weird awkward silences as well.
|
10-04-2009, 21:36 | #27 |
ex SAS
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: JO01ou
Posts: 10,062
|
I think some bits were funny, I certainly giggled a few times as did the family but I think that without a studio audience it seemed a bit forced, there were almost pauses where laughter should be.
__________________
|
10-04-2009, 21:37 | #28 |
'09 sexual conquests: 4.5
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,075
|
I suspect this one was as well, but noone laughed
|
10-04-2009, 21:41 | #29 |
Shacked up with the Archbishop
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canterbury
Posts: 378
|
Same thoughts here. Silence was definately not a good thing in the episode.
|
10-04-2009, 21:44 | #30 |
'09 sexual conquests: 4.5
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,075
|
Craig Charles is looking well for a smackhead though.
Chris Barrie is starting to look old. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|