30-04-2010, 08:09 | #111 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Simple fact is we couldn't join the Euro at the moment even if we wanted to. Too much debt - and too much more being created.
Not that several countries in the Eurozone aren't worse off - Greece, Spain, Portugal, Ireland. Even Germany is breaking the rules (though not by much). |
30-04-2010, 08:10 | #112 |
Old Git
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,016
|
The lack of being able to control fiscal policy to suit your own financial situation is just not a good idea, I think that is now beginning to make itself seen with recent events
|
30-04-2010, 10:15 | #113 |
Preparing more tumbleweed
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,038
|
The situation with Greece just about highlights the dangers (and strengths) of a single currency. The Euro has been good for Greece, it's strength has kept it's economy going.. but now it's really going down the crapper, the rest of the Euro using countries are being dragged down along with it. Your average tax payer in Germany (for example) is now suffering because of the actions of the Greek government.
That said I'm pro-Europe, but most definitely not in it's current ridiculously bloated bureaucratic mess. As much as I'm pro-Europe I think possibly the only way to fix the EU is to dissolve it entirely and rebuild it from scratch.
__________________
Mal: Define "interesting"? Wash: "Oh, God, oh, God, we're all gonna die"? |
30-04-2010, 10:21 | #114 | |
BBx woz 'ere :P
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,147,487,208
|
Quote:
__________________
No No! |
|
30-04-2010, 17:17 | #115 |
Old Git
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,016
|
spot on, we need to all work together but not in the current format
|
30-04-2010, 21:08 | #116 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Making one currency fit 16 economies was asking for trouble - and trouble is what they've got. While shoring countries up isn't pretty it's better than the other option - this time, there's no 'get out' clause to ponder while singing in the bath.
|
05-05-2010, 09:36 | #117 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 2,539
|
Finally something worth talking about. Labour and the Lib Dems will both ban Page 3 as they think tits are the work of the devil or something therefore the only way to vote is Conservative.
THIS LINK IS NS@W Just found out that I have to fly to Germany tonight so I won't be voting, not that it would have made any difference as Lib Dems are pretty much guaranteed to win Cambridge. |
05-05-2010, 13:44 | #118 |
The Mouse King of Denmark
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,476
|
My dad popped his voting paper in the ballot envelope, sealed it, put it in the postage envelope, posted it, and two days later... it dropped through the letterbox.
No idea why they make it possible to do that - their address on one side of the ballot envelope and yours on the other. Surely we're advanced enough now to misalign two pieces of text so one shows through the window in a certain orientation and the other won't when it's flipped? Then again, my dad is advanced enough that he shouldn't have made that mistake! Luckily my brother is in South America at the moment so he nabbed his envelope instead and reposted.
__________________
|
05-05-2010, 19:08 | #119 | |
Preparing more tumbleweed
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,038
|
Quote:
Every time it's left Murdoch with number 10 in his back pocket. We've had decades of him meddling in government. This year it's the Tories that he's got influence with, and very early on he swung support of his papers most behind. With Labour waning it was a sure shot, anyone with half a brain can see that a good percentage of the population is tired of them, that people are calling out for something new (much like the election back in '97). It was for a good while all about the Tories. Then all of a sudden, along came that first debate and the Lib Dems suddenly appeared to be David to the tory-labour Goliath. Immediately not 1, but 4 Murdoch controlled newspapers all came out with dirty accusations against a party leader they'd entirely ignored. Suddenly the safe bet Murdoch had made wasn't so safe any more, and it was all guns to the fore. Murdoch (or his cronies) can't stand the idea that they won't have as much influence in Government as they have before. After all, politicians have good memories even if the readers don't. They remember who supported their campaign and who didn't. 1 paper doing it would have looked legit. 2 would be unusual, but 4 all simultaneously? If he was that dirty he would have been picked up before. When newspapers try to call out Murdoch on his attempts to dictate the election (e.g. The Independant: "Rupert Murdoch won't decide the election – you will"), his sons went in like little bully boys to threaten and bluster, almost Mafiosa style "The boss heard what you said and he doesn't like it". So now we're getting to the last few days and out come the desperate cries, the last ditch attempts to persuade the Sun readers that something bad is going to happen if they dare to oppose the holy Murdoch's dictates. Whats the best way to lead Sun readers by the nose? Threaten that most holy of The Sun institutions, page 3. It is utterly, utterly pathetic. What is worse is it will damn well work too. There will be Sun readers who will vote Tory just because of it.
__________________
Mal: Define "interesting"? Wash: "Oh, God, oh, God, we're all gonna die"? |
|
05-05-2010, 21:40 | #120 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|