11-04-2011, 11:46 | #41 |
Penelope Pitstop
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,426
|
Same, job - lecturer in bookkeeping and accounts, description - errr well.....
__________________
|
11-04-2011, 11:46 | #42 | |
BBx woz 'ere :P
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,147,487,208
|
Quote:
I mean how many people have only coal/wood fired central heating?!?! And why does it matter how many bathrooms/toilets you have or how many rooms you have in your home? What I'm getting at is a lot of these questions don't really help advise anything that they don't already know.
__________________
No No! |
|
11-04-2011, 13:15 | #43 | |
Vodka Martini
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 786
|
Quote:
There are some link ups in data locally, and there are a few systems that are linked nationally, such as the Locta database, but the idea that data is available across the country, to whichever government body that wants it, is not really correct. It's true that the data is collected by various agencies, and it's theoretically true that the ONS could get access to that data, but the practicality of making those data sources talk to each other, and to maintain integrity while mining that data (i.e. knowing that John Smith on the Benefits database is the same John Smith on the Gas Supplier database and the same John Smith on the Births and Deaths register, for example) would be technically difficult and extremely costly. It's simply cheaper to ask everybody for the same information again. |
|
11-04-2011, 13:40 | #44 | |
Spinky-Spank
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 668. The Neighbour of the Beast
Posts: 11,226
|
Quote:
Same was mine - Code & Release Management - Managing & Releasing code.
__________________
"You only get one life. There's no God, no rules, except for those you accept or create for yourself. Then once it's over... it's over. Dreamless sleep for ever and ever. So why not be happy while you're here?" Nate Fisher |
|
11-04-2011, 13:59 | #45 | |
BBx woz 'ere :P
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,147,487,208
|
Quote:
__________________
No No! |
|
11-04-2011, 18:30 | #46 | ||
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Quote:
Quote:
I don't get what all the fuss is about. The law says you must complete it it doesn't say they're going to park up outside your front door and count how many days you're not there - nor haul you off to jail for staying one day longer than you said. If you don't want to tell them something then don't. |
||
11-04-2011, 18:57 | #47 | |
Provider of sensible advice about homosexuals
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Posts: 2,615
|
Quote:
Some as Mark says won't reveal answers any other way, we could guess but why do that when you can hopefully get the correct information. While much of the information is held across a variety of sources there's a few issues to sharing it including (but not exclusively) that it's difficult to get all the systems to talk to each other, data integrity and security is certainly more difficult to maintain when you're combining systems that were never intended for it, matching data against incomplete records (either because the information was never requested, someone didn't fill in the data correctly or because they've moved house/changed name/got married/whatever) is difficult if you want to get anything reliable out of it. Then of course there's potentially issues with the DPA since most of us won't have consented to our gas supplier sharing the information with others in any way that could possibly identify us - use any service you like as an example but most will at the very least have an opt out about sharing data which I almost habitually select even without thinking. It's one of those "damned if you do..." situations - if the collation of data was done by getting all government records systems and service supplier systems to talk to each other (assuming it could be done and the information was there) then it's Big Brother and unacceptable intrusion into their lives for a large percentage of the population, if they don't do this then it's a waste of time for the people who don't care about such a conflation of their personal data. In essence it's simpler for both practical and political reasons as well as more likely to get a useful set of data requesting it fresh from every household than trying to cobble together information from a variety of data sources. If it helps then try dividing the time you've spent on completing the census by the number of years until you get asked again - I work it out to be maybe 3 minutes a year?
__________________
"Your friend is the man that knows all about you, and still likes you." - Elbert Hubbard |
|
11-04-2011, 23:09 | #48 |
BBx woz 'ere :P
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,147,487,208
|
Oh I answered it ubt my answers were as vague and cryptic as possible - and ticked the n/a or similar option as many times as possible.
__________________
No No! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|