|
View Poll Results: Embarassed? | |||
Leave it as it is ":embarassed:" | 3 | 15.79% | |
Yay! Go back to the old skool "" | 8 | 42.11% | |
Something else all together? | 8 | 42.11% | |
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-09-2007, 22:05 | #31 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
How about a 'both' option?
You can do smiley ordering in vB, so you could easily change the current :embarassed: to , and then add the old (incorrect) spelling at the end so existing posts don't break. Of course, once the change has bedded in, the duplicate can go. |
12-09-2007, 22:06 | #32 |
L'Oréal
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 9,977
|
|
12-09-2007, 22:11 | #33 |
Custom Title
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fay-Lom mansion
Posts: 2,787
|
|
12-09-2007, 22:12 | #34 |
Joey Tempest
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gravesend.
Posts: 2,751
|
__________________
No Sig. |
12-09-2007, 22:13 | #35 |
Custom Title
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fay-Lom mansion
Posts: 2,787
|
|
12-09-2007, 22:14 | #36 |
Custom Title
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fay-Lom mansion
Posts: 2,787
|
|
12-09-2007, 22:18 | #37 |
L'Oréal
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 9,977
|
:OMG: ?
|
12-09-2007, 22:30 | #38 |
Custom Title
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fay-Lom mansion
Posts: 2,787
|
looks more like an :eek than does imo
|
12-09-2007, 22:31 | #39 |
Joey Tempest
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Gravesend.
Posts: 2,751
|
maybe switch them round then? stays the same and :wtf: is
__________________
No Sig. |
12-09-2007, 22:43 | #40 |
Custom Title
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fay-Lom mansion
Posts: 2,787
|
I think thats better too
|