20-09-2006, 14:33 | #1 |
Chef extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Infinite Loop
Posts: 11,143
|
Film Cameras - 35 SLR suggestions
Hi all,
Some of you may know Kitten is after a 35m Film SLR. I've been looking around and Pete has recommended the EOS 50 however I've been looking at Nikons. What are people's opinon's on the F75's? Are there any Nikon's I should be looking at?
__________________
"Dr Sheldon Cooper FTW!" |
20-09-2006, 16:13 | #2 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nr Liverpewl
Posts: 4,371
|
I'm not sure if there's any Nikon people here. In case there isn't you could try www.talkphotography.co.uk Lots of people who were once on "the other place" moved there.
|
20-09-2006, 22:14 | #3 |
Vodka Martini
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Church Broughton
Posts: 533
|
If you don't want to spend a lot then I can recommend a Pentax MZ-M, its a no frills, very lightweight, plastic manual focus SLR. Only luxury it has is a motorwinder magig. It's what I tend to find myself usually using.
If you want an older camera built like a poo-house then if you can find one a Minolta SRT101b. I have seen better cameras but it's my dad's and I don't think I have found a camera that I liked to use better, best bit is that it doesn't use batteries save for the light meter so you won't have a problem in the middle of nowhere*. Another one is the Nikkon F series which was used for sodding ages as the standard for photojournalists. Again, built like a tank. Only downside with these two is that they are old, cumbersome and heavy; finding one is a problem too. If you are after a modern decent 35mm SLR other than the MZ-M I really can't help you though. Personally, I avoid motorised winders which have to be used on a camera as they really really annoy me when I forget to change the batteries. *This being the reason I am not going to digital ever.
__________________
Last edited by William; 20-09-2006 at 22:21. |
22-09-2006, 10:05 | #4 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nr Liverpewl
Posts: 4,371
|
What did you get? Smelly Nikon?
|
22-09-2006, 10:50 | #5 |
Chef extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Infinite Loop
Posts: 11,143
|
Nope not quite, I predict an edit in a minute
__________________
"Dr Sheldon Cooper FTW!" |
22-09-2006, 19:51 | #6 |
Vodka Martini
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Church Broughton
Posts: 533
|
Bah autofocusing fancy looking camera cheater.
In truth its a good one.
__________________
|
22-09-2006, 20:00 | #7 |
Chef extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Infinite Loop
Posts: 11,143
|
heh well from what I read it was a good camera, the auto focus is a benefit but she'll mainly be using all the manual stuff
__________________
"Dr Sheldon Cooper FTW!" |
22-09-2006, 20:05 | #8 |
Vodka Martini
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Church Broughton
Posts: 533
|
Oh aye its a very good camera; i'm just not very fond of using modern film SLRs because I don't like the feel of them.
Since loosing access to a dark room though and just shelling out £30 to boots to get three films developed and to have them do a crap job. A digital is looking tempting even with the battery lark.
__________________
|
22-09-2006, 21:30 | #9 |
Chef extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Infinite Loop
Posts: 11,143
|
Well I'm pretty sure Kitten has access to a dark room
__________________
"Dr Sheldon Cooper FTW!" |
25-09-2006, 06:23 | #10 | |
Good Cat
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,550
|
Quote:
I heart my Canon AT-1. The only auto thing about it is the flashy self timer light I'd actually recommend an old Canon camera with an FD fit, because you can get loads of second hand lenses extremely cheaply. Pity I didn't see this earlier. The 300V is still a good choice though
__________________
Oooooh Cecil, what have you done? |
|