Unsigned band make chart history! - Page 2

kaiowas · 15-01-2007, 21:34

You'd need a lot less than that, 7000 was to get in the album chart. It's only 2500 for the singles chart.

Vaultingslinky · 16-01-2007, 00:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Le Feek

So, if someone had £7k spare they could guarantee themselves a position in the charts. It's about a pound a track isn't it?

Seems very open to fiddling to me.

For someone to invest that £7000 they would first have to have a track good enough for people to see/hear it in the charts then buy it.

And if the song is that good enough for people to buy it, then it would probably have entered the charts either way.

I will be surprised if what I am thinking actually makes any sense on paper...im tired

Rich_L · 16-01-2007, 00:58

Haha GordyR Hi-five song for number one

Daz · 16-01-2007, 11:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich_L

Haha GordyR Hi-five song for number one

It'd ruin his career, but I'm in

15-01-2007, 21:34	#11
kaiowas The Stig Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Fightertown USA Posts: 1,458	You'd need a lot less than that, 7000 was to get in the album chart. It's only 2500 for the singles chart. __________________ Anal Fish Porn

16-01-2007, 00:58	#13
Rich_L Dr Cocktapuss Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Seven Sizzles Posts: 1,044	Haha GordyR Hi-five song for number one __________________