15-02-2007, 23:48 | #11 |
The Stig
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fightertown USA
Posts: 1,458
|
I know I'm a very light user in terms of overall net usage simply because I don't engage in filesharing or gaming. However daz suggested that 2gig would not be enough for "heavy browsers" which I'd say we qualify as.
|
15-02-2007, 23:49 | #12 |
L'Oréal
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 9,977
|
Both Mic and I d/l stuff and Mic runs GW for at least a few hours every day - longer when he isn't at work
|
15-02-2007, 23:54 | #13 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
If you're not downloading much (what windows update/AV updates etc. need, the odd song off iTunes etc.), then 2GB is enough. Start downloading and it'll be gone in no time. The vast majority of users who don't know better would get away with 2GB.
Even if I'm not here, 2GB would last me about 5 days. |
16-02-2007, 10:41 | #14 | |
The Stig
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swad!
Posts: 10,713
|
Quote:
Though maybe kaiowas's stats prove me wrong Put it this way, my folks place (4 very occasional, very light users, no more than an hour at a time and never every day) use >2GB in a month.
__________________
apt-get moo |
|
16-02-2007, 10:47 | #15 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Don't think my parents even get to 1GB, never mind 2.
But you're right, videos will eat that up far faster than most things. |