So was Ch.4 right to broadcast the 'Alternative' Xmas Speech

benktlottie · 28-12-2008, 01:32

Channel 4 have traditionally aired contraversal things in the past. The media get up in arms, and there's always a pros and cons for why they did it. The burying under the patio, the lesbian kiss...

This will all be forgotten about and blown over next week.

Were they right? I don't know. Personally, it didnt replace the Queens speech at 3pm (which I watch/listen to religiously every year) and I chose not to turn onto channel 4 at 7.15pm or whatever time it was.

Did anyone actually watch it? Was it interesting?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

28-12-2008, 01:32	#11
benktlottie Nice weak cup of Earl Grey Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 11	Channel 4 have traditionally aired contraversal things in the past. The media get up in arms, and there's always a pros and cons for why they did it. The burying under the patio, the lesbian kiss... This will all be forgotten about and blown over next week. Were they right? I don't know. Personally, it didnt replace the Queens speech at 3pm (which I watch/listen to religiously every year) and I chose not to turn onto channel 4 at 7.15pm or whatever time it was. Did anyone actually watch it? Was it interesting?