Do you think Jacko was guilty.....

[Dymetrie]

Originally Posted by A Place of Light

Not really, because the OP requests your opinion and what lead you to form it. To be able to state as a matter of fact his innocence or guilt would've required the person to have been involved with the legal proceedings in depth, but as those people are in somewhat short supply (and almost certainly not members of this forum) I thought that opinions would be just fine.

Well I like to base my opinion on what I actually know. In this case then I don't know enough (and, in my belief, no one other than those involved know enough) to give a yes or no opinion to the OP.

Originally Posted by Greenlizard0

I'm still not really sure, though because of the very fact that the justice system is very vulnerable to how much money you can throw at it. Of course that doesn't answer in anyway whether he's guilty or innocent, a pity really because in an ideal world it'd be great to automatically assume true justice always takes place, and then that would be that.

Originally Posted by Feek

He's as innocent as OJ was.

And another reason why I refuse to give a yes or no opinion, given the way that money can make anyone innocent then the result of the court case can't convince me either way.

Originally Posted by Pheebs

There's no "wouldn't know until I had all the info in front of me" job.

This is a better description of the option I want. My opinion is that I don't care. However, given enough evidence, from either side, then I would make a judgement based on that.