Poker discussion thread...

Grandad · 23-02-2010, 20:09

I would say Harrington 1+2 but not 3, 3 is just a load of example stuff brought out to exploit the poker boom

I haven't read tha Harrington on cash books but unless there is a big change from his tourney style I can't see it suiting modern cash games

The Sklansky books are regarded as the best for cash players

Most of the collection above constitutes all the regarded standards that you should read

Well apart from the Hellmuth one which would make a good doorstop

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

23-02-2010, 20:09	#13
Grandad Old Git Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 2,016	I would say Harrington 1+2 but not 3, 3 is just a load of example stuff brought out to exploit the poker boom I haven't read tha Harrington on cash books but unless there is a big change from his tourney style I can't see it suiting modern cash games The Sklansky books are regarded as the best for cash players Most of the collection above constitutes all the regarded standards that you should read Well apart from the Hellmuth one which would make a good doorstop