The Great BD PC vs Console Debate

divine · 17-11-2008, 17:30

No it won't look the 'best it can' but then that's irrelevant if even when it isn't looking the best it can, it's still looking pretty damn good.

Just because you're not running at max settings all the time, doesn't mean it's suddenly crap and I certainly wouldn't refuse to play a game just because I can't max every setting available.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...rtment0000.jpg

Personally, I don't think that looks bad for a 3 year old PC with a pretty budget graphics upgrade a few months ago, do you? Certainly a match for the 360 version and more than good enough to be playable. (Though for some reason, maybe the way the AA is applied, that shot looks really aliased, which when actually playing it doesn't)

All your 360 games will look the 'best they can' on 5 year old hardware.

17-11-2008, 17:30	#10
divine Moonshine Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Southampton Posts: 3,201	No it won't look the 'best it can' but then that's irrelevant if even when it isn't looking the best it can, it's still looking pretty damn good. Just because you're not running at max settings all the time, doesn't mean it's suddenly crap and I certainly wouldn't refuse to play a game just because I can't max every setting available. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...rtment0000.jpg Personally, I don't think that looks bad for a 3 year old PC with a pretty budget graphics upgrade a few months ago, do you? Certainly a match for the 360 version and more than good enough to be playable. (Though for some reason, maybe the way the AA is applied, that shot looks really aliased, which when actually playing it doesn't) All your 360 games will look the 'best they can' on 5 year old hardware. __________________