So was Ch.4 right to broadcast the 'Alternative' Xmas Speech

benktlottie · 28-12-2008, 01:32

Channel 4 have traditionally aired contraversal things in the past. The media get up in arms, and there's always a pros and cons for why they did it. The burying under the patio, the lesbian kiss...

This will all be forgotten about and blown over next week.

Were they right? I don't know. Personally, it didnt replace the Queens speech at 3pm (which I watch/listen to religiously every year) and I chose not to turn onto channel 4 at 7.15pm or whatever time it was.

Did anyone actually watch it? Was it interesting?

28-12-2008, 01:32	#11
benktlottie Nice weak cup of Earl Grey Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 11	Channel 4 have traditionally aired contraversal things in the past. The media get up in arms, and there's always a pros and cons for why they did it. The burying under the patio, the lesbian kiss... This will all be forgotten about and blown over next week. Were they right? I don't know. Personally, it didnt replace the Queens speech at 3pm (which I watch/listen to religiously every year) and I chose not to turn onto channel 4 at 7.15pm or whatever time it was. Did anyone actually watch it? Was it interesting?