Boat Drinks  

Go Back   Boat Drinks > General > General Disruption

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22-04-2009, 13:27   #11
iCraig
iCustom User Title
 
iCraig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,250
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zirax View Post
Just bloody build nuclear :/
I watched a documentary on iPlayer not long ago about the future of energy and according to that and some very respected Nuclear experts it's simply incapable of catching up with the demand. The figures just didn't add up. The time it takes for a plant to be built, and its lifespan etc, it fell short of the country's current power demands, never mind the future demands. Renewable energy such as wind and solar power was also dismissed as nothing but a minor contributor.

Fusion power seems to be the future. The first experimental reactor has been built and under heavy testing. They're hoping to harness the power properly within 20 years. By the sounds of it Fusion power stations would outperform Nuclear many times over, and best of all, is completely clean. For those interested, read up on it. In a nut shell it's harnessing the same energy created by the sun.
__________________

Last edited by iCraig; 22-04-2009 at 13:30.
iCraig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2009, 13:31   #12
Zirax
Goes up to 11!
 
Zirax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,577
Default

Cameron is delivering one hell of a response.
Zirax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2009, 13:35   #13
divine
Moonshine
 
divine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 3,201
Default

CHP is a good energy source for any intermediate use until fusion is cracked properly, assuming it can be utilised effectively.
__________________
divine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2009, 13:39   #14
Zirax
Goes up to 11!
 
Zirax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,577
Default

Fusion is interesting, but it's still experimental. 20 years is a best case scenario really. Would love it to happen.

------------
Loss making companies can claim back some tax for 3 years

cash isa - 5100 from next year
Zirax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2009, 14:04   #15
Mark
Screaming Orgasm
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
Default

I meant to watch and record this, just to see the Chancellor squirm. And squirm. I hope they replay the whole thing - including Cameron. For once, it'll be worth it. If they don't, I'll have to find my iPlayer tools - I want this one for posterity.
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2009, 14:21   #16
Zirax
Goes up to 11!
 
Zirax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,577
Default

It's good for that. Was mostly listening to it while working, saw odd snippets.
Zirax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2009, 14:28   #17
Admiral Huddy
HOMO-Sapien
 
Admiral Huddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chelmsford
Posts: 6,692
Default

50% tax over £100k earners.

I'm pleased about this.. I'm fed up with being in the same tax band as someone earning £100k + whereas those on litttle or low income get everything.
__________________

I just got lost in thought.. It was very unfamiliar territory.
Techie Talk | My gaming Blog | PC spec | The Admirals log
Admiral Huddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2009, 14:37   #18
Glaucus
Absinthe
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Admiral Huddy View Post
50% tax over £100k earners.

I'm pleased about this.. I'm fed up with being in the same tax band as someone earning £100k + whereas those on litttle or low income get everything.
Totally silly attitude imo. Everyone should be taxed the same. If you get on in life and work hard you should benefit from the rewards.
Should raise the personal allowance to something like 10k then tax eh rest at 40%. Not only does it make life easier for the low paid, it makes it fair and easy for the tax man to work out.
__________________
Glaucus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2009, 14:46   #19
Admiral Huddy
HOMO-Sapien
 
Admiral Huddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chelmsford
Posts: 6,692
Default

but it's not like that. You have already condtradicted yourself by saying everyone should be taxed the same but in the next breath say that those on low income should get more help more.. There is already a tiered system for those on low income... like lower taxes and family tax credit etc.. but nothing for Mr average..
__________________

I just got lost in thought.. It was very unfamiliar territory.
Techie Talk | My gaming Blog | PC spec | The Admirals log

Last edited by Admiral Huddy; 22-04-2009 at 14:48.
Admiral Huddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2009, 14:49   #20
Glaucus
Absinthe
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Admiral Huddy View Post
but it's not like that. You have already condractioed yourself by saying that those on low income get more.. There is already a tiered system for those on low income... but nothing for mr average..
It's not a contradiction, under a flat tax, everyone would get the same. Everyone is entitled to the personal allowance.
why punish those who work hard? who will already pay far more taxes through VAT and all the other hidden taxes. there is no justification to tax the well paid more, other than jealousy.
__________________
Glaucus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:20.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.