|
22-08-2011, 23:11 | #1 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
That they did, but then so did a lot of others (BlackBerry for one, though at least I suspect they didn't launch on old tech).
Given Nokia's all-but-ditching of Symbian, HP's move wasn't really surprising. Let's face it - Palm were on their last legs before HP 'rescued' them. The Pre itself was also too late. Just the three big players now - Android, iOS, and Windows Phone. With them all at each others' throats over patents there's no way a small player is likely to hang around (Chinese rip-off clones excepted). |
23-08-2011, 09:33 | #2 |
Preparing more tumbleweed
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,038
|
I would bother with it simply because there is a large drive to get Android on it. Qualcom are already demonstrating it's perfectly possible.
Cheap, very decent spec, 90 quid tablet, running Android? Yes please!
__________________
Mal: Define "interesting"? Wash: "Oh, God, oh, God, we're all gonna die"? |
23-08-2011, 10:37 | #3 |
Chef extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Infinite Loop
Posts: 11,143
|
Well yes if you could put Android on it then yes it could be quite interesting
__________________
"Dr Sheldon Cooper FTW!" |
23-08-2011, 11:57 | #4 |
Spinky-Spank
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 668. The Neighbour of the Beast
Posts: 11,226
|
I'll stick with my ipad ta
__________________
"You only get one life. There's no God, no rules, except for those you accept or create for yourself. Then once it's over... it's over. Dreamless sleep for ever and ever. So why not be happy while you're here?" Nate Fisher |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|