10-04-2007, 15:58 | #11 |
Baby Bore
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 9,770
|
If I'm not going to get full advantage of the 800Mhz memory does that mean I'd be just as well off with the 667 or 533? Because they are significantly cheaper
MB |
10-04-2007, 16:01 | #12 |
The Stig
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swad!
Posts: 10,713
|
Depends on your disk configuration I guess. Re-encoding large HD movies I imagine requires a lot of disk bandwidth, so without any RAID it's possible that'll be your bottleneck and slower memory wont matter so much.
Cant say for sure though, it's not something I've looked into. I can say that converting 720p on the fly with my 3800 X2, 2GB ram and striped hard drives works fine, though having the on-die controller might make that comparison somewhat invalid.
__________________
apt-get moo |
10-04-2007, 16:07 | #13 |
Baby Bore
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 9,770
|
I'm not going to manipulating the HD material past throwing it at the projector, the work the PC does is mainly; parseing the PAR2 files, decoding the downloads from newsgroups and then unziping them into a single playable file, apart from that its just playing different movies so of which I want to use HD for. Any extra power can be used for post processing but its not hugely important to be honest.
MB |
10-04-2007, 16:18 | #14 | |
The Stig
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swad!
Posts: 10,713
|
If we're only decoding content then that sort of spec should be fine. Microsoft once said this:
Quote:
I use the 360 as my front end so need the re-encoding powah!
__________________
apt-get moo |
|
10-04-2007, 16:37 | #15 | |
Provider of sensible advice about homosexuals
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Posts: 2,615
|
Quote:
The motherboard seems fairly well specified for a mATX model and Foxconn are one of the biggest manufacturers around although mainly OEM.
__________________
"Your friend is the man that knows all about you, and still likes you." - Elbert Hubbard |
|
10-04-2007, 16:57 | #16 |
Baby Bore
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 9,770
|
Thanks for that, I'm wondering if its worth springing for the new E6420 C2D which has the full 4Mb of ram on the die, apparently it speeds up a few things and its only £10 more, although not in stock yet.
Also should I go with Vista 64 or 32 for this, I suspect I will get Home Premium as it has all the things I will need MB |
10-04-2007, 16:59 | #17 |
Baby Bore
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 9,770
|
How much difference would I see between the E6320 and the E6420? I presume not that much if I'm not gaming?
MB |
10-04-2007, 17:17 | #18 |
Stan, Stan the FLASHER MAN!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In bed with your sister
Posts: 5,483
|
The extra cache doesn't make much of a difference for encoding etc (only 1% or 2%) see here. The only real difference is with Office applications and games from what I've read.
I don't think you would see a huge difference between the E6320 and the E6420 either, although the extra speed would make a bit of difference. As for Vista. As long as there are no problems with driver compatibility or software compatibility, there's no reason not to get the 64 bit version. You'll obviously need to check that there are 64 bit drivers for all your hardware and check the compatibility of any software you're likely to be using. Stan
__________________
Just because I have a short attention span doesn't mean I... |
10-04-2007, 19:37 | #19 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
There's a small chance you might have problems with that spangly new ShowCenter box and 64-bit, especially given the hassle you had getting it working on 32-bit. Worth doing some research on that at least.
|
10-04-2007, 19:42 | #20 |
Baby Bore
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 9,770
|
Fair point, it seems to work OK for most people with Vista but need more info about the 64bit version.
MB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|