23-08-2007, 06:24 | #11 |
ex SAS
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: JO01ou
Posts: 10,062
|
The result of an overnight run..
Don't believe the CPU Speed, it doesn't read correctly. The reason it says the time has changed since the start is because I'm anal about clock accuracy and run a utility to sync the clock every hour. Temps are rather nice.
__________________
|
23-08-2007, 08:25 | #12 |
I iz speshul
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 6,296
|
Nice I'm looking forward to trying to overclock my E6750 when I get it, not overclocked any of my CPU's for some time.
__________________
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine as children do. It's not just in some of us; it is in everyone. And as we let our own lights shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others. |
23-08-2007, 09:29 | #13 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,023
|
Nice clock. My E6850 is happy as larry at 3.6Ghz atm but doesn't want to go any higher without major voltage hikes which in turn means daft temps and/or noisy cooling.
Am keeping an eye on the new G0 Q6600s to see what they can do and might switch but, if I'm honest, I have no need for a quad core at the mo, dual does everything I need.
__________________
|
23-08-2007, 13:08 | #14 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Feek, is that temperature a core temperature or a junction temperature? Core 2 Duo CPUs have three temperature sensors - one on each core and one on the casing (junction).
The reason I ask is because most software that doesn't know about this reads the junction temperature, which is typically 10-15C lower than the core temperature. To give you an idea, my stock E6600 has Tjunc of 34C, TcoreA of 45C, and TcoreB of 44C. It's not particularly critical though as I believe these chips are rated well into the 70s, if not 80s. PS - recent versions of SpeedFan seem to know about the core sensors. Last edited by Mark; 23-08-2007 at 13:11. |
23-08-2007, 14:41 | #15 |
Stan, Stan the FLASHER MAN!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In bed with your sister
Posts: 5,483
|
Nice going Feek.
That's roughly as far as I got my E6600 at stock volts (3.15GHz iirc) - if you get it much further, I'll be jealous and impressed at the same time Mark is right in what he says regarding the core temperatures but as I said in my PM, these CPUs are quite happy up to about 85C and I doubt very much if you'll ever put anywhere near as much strain on it as Orthos does so your normal working temperature will be much lower. 11% oveclock on the RAM with 0.1 or 0.2V to spare is a good result too. Good work dude
__________________
Just because I have a short attention span doesn't mean I... |
23-08-2007, 15:05 | #16 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Anyone prepared to teach me the ways of overclocking the DS3/DS4 boards then? I only have cheapo PC6400 RAM in mine so going beyond stock RAM speeds is out, but everythine else is fair game.
|
23-08-2007, 15:25 | #17 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,023
|
PC6400 is good up to 400Mhz FSB speed. As even the latest C2D processors are only 333Mhz and most are 266Mhz, you have loads of headroom to increase your FSB. Basically just slowly crank up the FSB speed in the BIOS, testing for stability as you go with stressing programs like Orthos and Prime95, checking temps too with things like CoreTemp or Speedfan.
__________________
|
23-08-2007, 15:26 | #18 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Well, it's a Linux box, which means I'd have to find a Linux-based stress tool first, I guess.
|
23-08-2007, 15:31 | #19 |
The Stig
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swad!
Posts: 10,713
|
__________________
apt-get moo |
23-08-2007, 15:38 | #20 |
Stan, Stan the FLASHER MAN!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In bed with your sister
Posts: 5,483
|
The E6600 is 266MHz BUS speed with a 9X multiplier. If you have a recent BIOS version, you should be able to lower the multiplier (you won't be able to go above 9 but you should be able to go as low as 6).
If you want to keep your RAM and FSB in sync, I would drop the multiplier to 7 or 8 (if your RAM won't overclock) and start upping the BUS speed as Vertigo1 suggests. If you raise the BUS speed to 400 to match the spec of your RAM you would get a clock speed of 2.8GHz on a 7X multiplier (should do that no problem) or 3.2GHz on an 8X multipier (probably pushing it a bit).
__________________
Just because I have a short attention span doesn't mean I... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|