Hanna Montana apologies for racy photographs!

[Lomster]

Originally Posted by SCM

Also both her parents were allegedly at that shoot so why didn't they object at the time? Were they too busy counting the cash for the shoot?

SCM

were they? OMG if it was one of my daughters I'd be dragging them away from it.

[SCM]

Originally Posted by Lomster

were they? OMG if it was one of my daughters I'd be dragging them away from it.

Just did a search online and its the usual they said oh no we didn't situation.

Vanity fair have said in an interview the parents/representatives were there all day and the photographer discussed the shots showing them as well while she was taking them.

The parents side is saying we left before the end, not seeing any pictures as the shoot went and these pictures were taken while she had no one there to look after her. Just doesn't add up this bit about not seeing the photos especially with it being a top photographer, as i know myself if i ever do modelling shoots i would talk over the shots and show them to the model as i went along.

I'm sorry she is 15 and the parents are claiming they left her alone in a studio with a photographer under no supervision. At 15 they were there watching as most parents/representatives would be but are doing the usual butt covering exercise to paint them as the victims over all this.

Still great publicity all round for everyone and the cynic in me says this was what was planned all along.

SCM

[Feek]

Originally Posted by SCM

Still great publicity all round for everyone and the cynic in me says this was what was planned all along.

bingo

[Lomster]

Tis Faysh,

I know you see more on the street, BUT that's not a backless dress she's wearing. She's essentially naked under that sheet. That's where the problem lies with me - an naked underage girl, (not very) wrapped up in a bedsheet.

[Lana]

Originally Posted by Lomster

Tis Faysh,

I know you see more on the street, BUT that's not a backless dress she's wearing. She's essentially naked under that sheet. That's where the problem lies with me - an naked underage girl, (not very) wrapped up in a bedsheet.

Thats the part that bugs me too. Yes she's a star, but she's a CHILD star. Those pictures are so inappropriate because of both her age and her fan base.
It's like she's trying to show that she's grown up so she won't always be typecast as a Disney actress...but come on. She IS a Disney actress and she ISN'T grown up.

[Desmo]

I'm with the above. Whilst you do see girls out wearing less (which isn't right either IMO), she is a young girl in a state of undress as far as I can see. It's playing on a sexy image which just shouldn't be done at that age.

[Jasper]

I don't see the problem, although it's a bit crap that they've made her up like a smackhead prostitute. Might have to start watching Hannah Montana!

[Garp]

Is this the bit where I mention she had a major DVD released a fortnight ago in America? Co-incidence?

[Lana]

didn't you know there is no such thing as a coincidence, especially in the biz?
;-)