New Trek Film - Page 3

Will · 15-10-2007, 15:30

Ah ok gotcha.

Del Lardo · 15-10-2007, 20:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by petemc

I wish they'd let them do this: http://bztv.typepad.com/newsviews/fi...2004Reboot.pdf

Just read through that and while it does sound rather exciting and the basic idea does make a lot of sense the premise that they use as the story line for the reboot, that all bi-peds are a result of a million year old civilisation, was done in a two parter TNG which involved Picards old archiology professor with a smattering of Klingons and Romulans (IIRC). IMO that is rather lame and lets the whole thing down

petemc · 15-10-2007, 20:40

Yeah but JMS ftw.

petemc · 19-10-2007, 10:48

http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/10/18/...ams-star-trek/

leowyatt · 19-10-2007, 11:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daz

Even numbered Trek films are the good ones (Wrath of Kahn (2) and First Contact (8) being my personal favourites), the odd ones are widely reagrded to be the most pantsest.

The Search for Spock was crap imo

My favourite film of all time is Number 6

Mark · 19-10-2007, 11:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by petemc

...

Nice photoshop there. Don't worry - there's a confession in the article, but just in case someone thought it might be the real McCoy.

PS - 6 or 8 would get my vote.

Muban · 20-10-2007, 09:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daz

Even numbered Trek films are the good ones (Wrath of Kahn (2) and First Contact (8) being my personal favourites), the odd ones are widely reagrded to be the most pantsest.

The Search for Spock was crap imo

2, 6 and 8 are my favourites. Although I always thought that the even numbered thing was blown out of the water by 4 (The Voyage Home), worst Trek film ever

Or maybe that was the exception that proved the rule

Though Nemesis broke that rule again and also took the worst film title! All in my opinion of course

Lopez · 20-10-2007, 10:00

6 is my favourite too.

4 was only ever meant to be a "hamming it up" film - all Trek has a tongue-in-cheek element but 4 pushed that a bit further.

5 is probably the worst, it's almost painful to watch in places.

Not that I like Star Trek or anything.

Tak · 28-10-2007, 10:32

Shatner sad over Trek movie snub

Quote:

William Shatner, who played Captain Kirk in the original Star Trek series, has said he "can't believe" he has not been asked to be in the new movie.

Steeps · 30-10-2007, 21:51

They killed off shatner in Generations, of course they couldn't use him again!

15-10-2007, 15:30	#21
Will BBx woz 'ere :P Join Date: Jan 1970 Posts: 2,147,487,208	Ah ok gotcha. __________________ *No No!*

15-10-2007, 20:40	#23
petemc Moonshine Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Nr Liverpewl Posts: 4,371	Yeah but JMS ftw. __________________ Thats no hamster, its a space station!

19-10-2007, 10:48	#24
petemc Moonshine Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Nr Liverpewl Posts: 4,371	http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/10/18/...ams-star-trek/ __________________ Thats no hamster, its a space station!

20-10-2007, 10:00	#28
Lopez Bad Cat Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Leicestershire Posts: 808	6 is my favourite too. 4 was only ever meant to be a "hamming it up" film - all Trek has a tongue-in-cheek element but 4 pushed that a bit further. 5 is probably the worst, it's almost painful to watch in places. Not that I like Star Trek or anything. __________________ NO

30-10-2007, 21:51	#30
Steeps Long Island Iced Tea Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bedfordshire Posts: 143	They killed off shatner in Generations, of course they couldn't use him again! __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode