DSLR or not

[Mark]

I've been considering which camera to get next for about the last year, but not having holidays or the likes to go on has meant no urgency. Now, that's changed. I have under three weeks.

My last two cameras have been Sony - specifically DSC-F717 and DSC-P200. The fact that I had an F717 shows I'm not averse to big cameras, but there is of course a time and a place for compacts. The P200 is fine and I'll be keeping it, the F717 is long in the tooth and frankly, though it was top of the range in it's day, I'm generally much happier with the output from the P200.

Continuing with the theme, my next camera was going to be a DSC-H5 (Bridge camera, 12x zoom, same as the one owned by Mejinks). Three months ago I would have got it, no question. That's changed now the camera has been superceded by the DSC-H9. Unfortunately I can't wait for that, as it's not due to hit the shops until about a month after I get back. I can of course still get the H5, but now I know it's an old model, I'm not sure I want to.

So, that brings me to what else. I do have a habit of trying to push cameras as far as they will go, and sometimes beyond, with the inevitable disappointment that follows. But, given my eyesight, I'm never going to be that good and I'm usually going to be relying on the camera to do some of the work (particularly focusing). Even so, I'm definitely not averse to use of manual settings - and regularly do use them, even on the compact.

My primary use is going to be holiday shots, and for those alone I'd be happy with most cameras, but I do like going to shows, sporting events and airshows, and those are where the problems start. I've never had a camera that's produced even close to satisfactory output from airshows, and while I've done better at sporting events and shows, I know there is much room for improvement. I'll certainly be going to Busch Gardens and SeaWorld while on holiday, and I'll certainly want to be taking action shots while there.

This is what brings me well out of the compact territory. I thought a bridge camera would be a happy medium, but now I'm not so sure given their poor low light performance. This is why I've been considering a 'low-end' DSLR. Problem is, I really don't want to spend several thousand pounds on a camera and lenses. I certainly don't mind spending £600-£1,000 though, if a camera is going to satisfy my needs for more than the typical two years I'm getting out of existing cameras. Buying two non-DSLR cameras would get me well into the £600 territory so it's economically justifiable.

I've asked a similar question on other forums, but as the majority don't know me, I got the answer I expected. I need a more candid answer from those who do know me. As you know, I reserve the right to make my own decision at the end, but that doesn't mean the comments aren't welcomed or don't help me find the right decision - particularly as I have an extreme lack of knowledge in this area.