26-03-2008, 21:04 | #51 | |
Moonshine
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nr Liverpewl
Posts: 4,371
|
Quote:
__________________
Thats no hamster, its a space station! |
|
26-03-2008, 21:20 | #52 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 3,201
|
The old ones maybe, the iPod Touch dicks on everything else i've used from a great height in most departments.
__________________
|
26-03-2008, 22:12 | #53 | |
I'm going for a scuttle...
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,021
|
Quote:
Yeah, I do think that some Apple products aren't as good as the competition and yes, you can get better but thats not being agressive, derisory or anything like that, I just can't understand the following they have - looking at it objectively for a moment, why would anyone want an iPhone when it lacks 'basic' features and costs the earth for it?! The iPod has a horrendously flawed output stage which is audible (to me, for the music I listen to) despite an innovative control system. I turn on my MP3 player, hit play, put it in my pocket and forget about it - so the UI isn't all that. The iPod Touch is kind of a hybrid device and the stuff it does makes it a fantastic device, but thats because its more than an MP3 player despite the iPod tag (imo). Oh and for the love of god, I do not have a U in my handle. |
|
26-03-2008, 22:22 | #54 | |
I'm going for a scuttle...
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,021
|
Quote:
No toys were hurt in the making of that post. Sat here with a smile. It does annoy me though. |
|
26-03-2008, 22:23 | #55 |
BBx woz 'ere :P
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,147,487,208
|
Well I started the thread mainly as I was sharing my excitement at potentially starting to use a Mac - I didn't want this thread to be turned into an apple vs everything else - it's obvious some people aren't interested in entertaining the idea of other products just as some people are sick of others - but I didn't want this to be the case.
Can we just say horses for courses? Some people think macs kick ass, some people don't "get" them, and let it be at that?
__________________
No No! |
26-03-2008, 22:23 | #56 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Yes, the audio output stages on most - certainly the older - iPods are not the best in the business, and their headphones certainly aren't, but save for the headphones which are easily and relatively cheaply replaced is the average man on the street who hasn't had the benefit of high-end audio experience, acoustic chambers and whatever else really going to notice, especially when they're playing an inherently lossy file format anyway? Even WAV and FLAC are lossy if you want to be that pedantic about it (not that the iPod supports them).
Average guy on the street isn't going to have any clue with some of the hoops some of us (myself included) go through to get the best quality CD rips. While I admit I think I can hear a quality improvement with my new rips I suspect it's just placebo. My hearing really isn't that good. Yes, Apple do go a lot for design. Yes, you pay a premium for that and the brand, and yes, fanboys lap it up. All that said, you don't achieve the success that the iPod has on the back purely of design. Apple got in first with the best end-to-end experience with iTunes and the iPod, and like it or not, the rest of the market had to play catch-up. If you don't care for Apple's products, that's fine with me - don't buy them. I don't particularly like iPods either due to their closed nature, which is why I've never bought one - though I'll admit to at least a small hankering after an iTouch (note - not the iPhone). However, not that I accuse you of doing this even though you did use the word, please don't go around telling everyone else they made crap choices. They just made different choices, for different reasons. Last edited by Mark; 26-03-2008 at 22:26. |
26-03-2008, 22:33 | #57 | |
I'm going for a scuttle...
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,021
|
I really need to start making things painfully clear don't I? I am not specifically talking about anybody here, or their choices. I didn't say anyone made a crap choice, nor did I say I don't care for Apple products. I am talking generally, about the general view of the general public.
You don't have to have the best or even a good product to have a big or the biggest market share. McDonalds, Vauxhall (by and large), Sony, Bose.... Thats my point. They get lauded as the be all and end all by people who largely don't know better (which I will be forced no doubt into explicitly stating is nobody in this thread). You know, the iPod Touch might well prove to be the single best Apple product ever made! If it could phone people (discounting VOIP here) it would walk all over the iPhone... Quote:
Of course, I would remove that piece of **** excuse of an operating system and install a proper one, but there we go Last edited by Dr. Z; 26-03-2008 at 22:37. |
|
26-03-2008, 22:48 | #58 | |
Moonshine
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 3,201
|
Quote:
They're by and large the same thing, just the iPhone has more features and gets its software updates for free... If the iTouch could phone people it'd just be a slightly less crippled iPhone. Or are you referring purely to the expense of it compared to an iPhone?
__________________
|
|
26-03-2008, 22:56 | #59 | |
I'm going for a scuttle...
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,021
|
Quote:
|
|
26-03-2008, 23:08 | #60 | |
BBx woz 'ere :P
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,147,487,208
|
Quote:
No mate I wasn't singling anyone out - I was just talking about the riling in general that seems to be happening in my thread Besides I agreed with most of what you said early on in the thread.
__________________
No No! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|