|
16-10-2008, 20:41
|
#71 |
|
Moonshine
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nr Liverpewl
Posts: 4,371
|
Its Sylar! He stole Hiro's time travel ability and jumped into the future!
__________________
Thats no hamster, its a space station! |
|
|
|
16-10-2008, 20:46
|
#72 | |
|
A large glass of Merlot
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Letchworth with a Lightsaber
Posts: 5,819
|
Quote:
/me hearts Sylar 
__________________
 Khef, Ka and Ka-Tet.... |
|
|
|
|
|
16-10-2008, 21:19
|
#73 |
|
Moonshine
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nr Liverpewl
Posts: 4,371
|
__________________
Thats no hamster, its a space station! |
|
|
|
|
16-10-2008, 21:29
|
#74 |
|
Dirteh Kitteh
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hiding out in Mormon Country
Posts: 1,629
|
You know, the Zach looks like he could play a VERY pissed off Vulcan quite well!! He has that totally evil look down to an art form!!
__________________
 A bullet may have your name on it, but shrapnel is addressed "to whom it may concern". |
|
|
|
|
16-10-2008, 21:41
|
#75 |
|
The Mouse King of Denmark
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,476
|
I had no idea Harold from Harold and Kumar was in it!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
16-10-2008, 22:32
|
#76 | |
|
L'Oréal
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 9,977
|
Quote:
 So true
__________________
The look on your face when a toddler rips out your heart and shows it to you? Priceless.... For everything else, there's FWOOSH! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
17-10-2008, 18:14
|
#77 |
|
Shoes, Boobs & Corsets
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The fastest town in Scotland
Posts: 1,882
|
Hopefully the film itself will be good. I really don't like the casting though, would have been so much better if they had gone for less well known actors (especially those who have played quite stereotypical roles).
...oh and one last thing, maybe it's me but Kirk looks like he has an infeasibly large forehead? |
|
|
|
|
25-10-2008, 19:53
|
#78 |
|
Absinthe
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,023
|
As a die-hard Trekkie I hope this film is good, I really do. That aid, Abrams is annoying me lately tbh. His entire TV/film making credo seems to be to throw in as many questions as possible with little to no answers. I got fed up with Lost because of it and, good as it was, Cloverfield was another example of loads of questions with no answers.
If this tendency infests the Trek film I'm going to be annoyed. The casting is also a recipe for disaster IMO. Quinto as Spock intrigues me a bit but I think Pegg as Scotty is a huge mistake.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
25-10-2008, 21:58
|
#79 |
|
Moonshine
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nr Liverpewl
Posts: 4,371
|
I once read that Abrams has this box. He never opens it, just looks at it. He has no idea whats inside. The man is brilliant at suspense, at posing questions and creating mystery but as he's never opened the box he's rubbish at resolution. So the new Trek film will be 85 minutes of WOW and then 5 minutes of "Seriously? **** off, thats rubbish."
__________________
Thats no hamster, its a space station! |
|
|
|
|
25-10-2008, 22:22
|
#80 |
|
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Speaking of Trek, the recent spat between Shatner and Takei is a bit of a downer.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7686019.stm Not really sure who is the troublemaker here - sounds like a bit of both. 
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
