31-12-2009, 20:54 | #1 |
Long Island Iced Tea
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 285
|
Cops with guns
Lived near Gatwick for the last 20 years at certain times of the year and after certain incidents there were armed police with sub-machine guns (MP5's at a guess). Passing through Gatwick and there was one officer with what was probably an assault rifle (my Call of Duty eye says it looked a bit like a M16 - but I am probably wrong in that).
When did armed police start carrying assault rifles? as far as I could see he was the only one with that type of weapon, others were carrying smaller guns. |
31-12-2009, 21:04 | #2 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 3,201
|
In terms of SMGs and ARs I didn't think the UK police really used much other than H&K equipment and I can't think of anything they make that looks like an M16 (the G36 for example, looks nothing like it).
So... either I don't know all that much about police weaponry, or it wasn't police but a more specialist unit of some sort. edit - Wiki has a page for everything! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...United_Kingdom Did it look like anything listed there?
__________________
|
31-12-2009, 21:43 | #3 | |
I'm Free
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tyneside
Posts: 3,061
|
Quote:
More and more force are adopting carbine assault rifles with a .223in / 5.56mm calibre as it has far better stopping power than a 9mm round and will not be stopped by body armours unless they are of a more heavy duty and specialist nature. It is unlikely to be a rifle of the M-16 family you saw although I know of forces that have trialled the M4 carbine. The most widely used assault carbines in police use are the Heckler & Koch G36C and Sig 556 although they are both limited to semi-automatic fire only and the Sig is getting long in the tooth now.
__________________
" Well, old bean, life is really so bloody awful that I feel it’s my absolute duty to be chirpy and try and make everybody else happy too." David Niven, 1910-1983. |
|
31-12-2009, 22:22 | #4 |
Long Island Iced Tea
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 285
|
Didn't really look like any of those, reason I thought it was a M16 was the butt of the gun looked similar to this:
The above is an M4... although it looked longer than that... admittedly the officer may have been smaller than the average American which may throw the scale off. As I say most of my gun knowledge comes from watching TV and playing computer games which may not be the best source of knowledge. |
31-12-2009, 23:58 | #5 |
I'm Free
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tyneside
Posts: 3,061
|
The extendable butt on many rifles look pretty similar these days.
MP5, G36 etc. They all have retractable butt options.
__________________
" Well, old bean, life is really so bloody awful that I feel it’s my absolute duty to be chirpy and try and make everybody else happy too." David Niven, 1910-1983. |
01-01-2010, 00:20 | #6 |
Long Island Iced Tea
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 285
|
Probably just that then, may not have been an Assault Rifle just a gun with a retractable butt.
Just re-read your first post... is it purely the stopping power of Carbines over SMGs or are people walking around using body armour causing mischief, you would think that body armour would make someone quite conspicuous. |
01-01-2010, 00:31 | #7 |
Dirteh Kitteh
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hiding out in Mormon Country
Posts: 1,629
|
You get someone skinny like me (6'3" 165lbs) wearing standard Kevlar body armour I look like your bog standard rugby player if I'm wearing a jacket. So, no. Someone wearing plenty of armour to stop a 9mm round wouldn't be worthy of a second glance.
Someone wearing enough to stop a .223/5.56mm round would look like a 16th century knight...
__________________
A bullet may have your name on it, but shrapnel is addressed "to whom it may concern". |
01-01-2010, 15:30 | #8 |
Columbian Coffee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 99
|
My Dad knows one maybe two of the armed officers at Gatwick, and the G36c is pretty much standard amongst them now. Every one i've seen when picking my lady up for the airport is a G36C with a G17 sidearm.
I didn't think the penetration of the 5.56mm NATO cartridge was that great in any case as it is a tumbling/fragmenting round? I've seen many a debate on it's suitability in the military as it simply isn't putting bodies on the ground as it were. This was quite interesting (if a little sensationalist)
__________________
Last edited by Gaijin; 01-01-2010 at 15:42. |
01-01-2010, 15:33 | #9 |
Preparing more tumbleweed
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,038
|
Sorry.. had to be done given the thread title
__________________
Mal: Define "interesting"? Wash: "Oh, God, oh, God, we're all gonna die"? |
01-01-2010, 17:23 | #10 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,247
|
I disagree. You'd need more specialised (read more expensive) body armour, but it doesn't necessarily mean more bulky. Indeed, in some cases it's even easier to conceal than conventional armour.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|