06-05-2007, 12:28 | #1 |
Deep Throat
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,512
|
PSP and resolutions and gumph
Hello my techhy minded friends!
I am completely numpterlicious when it comes to tech stuff. You know my greeting cards? Well... What resolution should I have them at before sending them off to the printers? Pickys digi cam photos have a resolution of 72dpi (182.8dpc)... should I do them like that or is that being too... erm... precise (I don't think that's the right word I'm wanting to use but my brains gone kaputt.. you know what I mean. Too big, too fidgy, too what-do-u-mah-call-it, too WOAH etc)? I'm using PSP to do the greeting cards and will then be pdfing them (... not sure how yet but I will be!) I really want them to be UBER crisp... not at all blurred or nowt! Fankoo for your help people! (got a horrible feeling I maybe redrawing some pics today due to resolutions. Bumkins.) |
06-05-2007, 12:32 | #2 | |
Magners
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,865
|
Using something like pdf creator, you can "print" your pictures directly to PDF. No loss of resolution or messing about with cameras and stuff.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
06-05-2007, 12:34 | #3 | |
The Stig
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swad!
Posts: 10,713
|
Quote:
I'm sure he'll have the best advice for you Pheebs
__________________
apt-get moo |
|
06-05-2007, 12:42 | #4 | |
Magners
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,865
|
Stop making me look like a n00b Daz!
Doesn't psp also do postscript as well?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
06-05-2007, 13:13 | #5 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 2,692
|
Let me clarify Pheebs question...
although her images will be 10cm x 10cm print size, how many pixels should she make it? I think a standard resolution is 72 pixels per inch, but these are pretty blurry when resized to 10cmx10cm. Last edited by Pickers; 06-05-2007 at 13:35. |
06-05-2007, 13:17 | #6 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
72dpi is the sort of resolution you'd typically find on the web/display purposes. It's nowhere near enough for print use (at least not if you want a good, crisp print).
I believe something like 300dpi would more realistic, but as we have a printing expert in the house, it's best to wait for his advice. |
06-05-2007, 13:46 | #8 |
The Last Airbender
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pigmopad
Posts: 11,915
|
At 100% (10cm x 10cm) you pic wants to be a minimum of 300dpi for lithographic printing
Pheebs, I haven't forgotten your last PM. Just been a bit busy, I'll get back to you on Tuesday
__________________
|
06-05-2007, 14:10 | #9 |
Deep Throat
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,512
|
Aww fankoo people
Just wanna say though: ARRGGHH!!!! Pickys doing some weird ass thing on the poota, I've ended up so confused and laughing so much I've cried.... all my drawings need to be redrawn too! All this "pixels mean that" and "the line is still the same WIDTH!" "zooming in DOESN't make it bigger"! I need to go wee now. |
06-05-2007, 15:01 | #10 |
Deep Throat
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,512
|
whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?
*runs off to get picky* |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|