26-03-2008, 11:54 | #1 |
Combat Spanker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,292
|
OMG! G0t lens?
I have a new toy, on loan atm the mo from my lovely friend Canon Bob over at TP
Its mine until August, however if I decide I want to keep it, its mine for a mere £240 The thing weighs a sodding tonne, and the lens hood is bigger than my head |
26-03-2008, 12:01 | #2 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
LOL. I don't think whoever coined the 'hoody' term had that idea in mind.
Nice piece of kit. Enjoy. |
26-03-2008, 14:27 | #3 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nr Liverpewl
Posts: 4,371
|
Nice At that price BUY IT!
__________________
Thats no hamster, its a space station! |
26-03-2008, 15:13 | #4 |
I'm going for a scuttle...
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,021
|
I still miss mine now
Fantastic fantastic lens, really for that price you should just do it, no questions asked. /me wants one again |
26-03-2008, 16:37 | #5 |
Good Cat
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,550
|
IIRC he said you could pay it off in installments too? If so, DO IT! I was going to get one of these last month with my bonus, but other things got in the way. Fantastic lens that you will not regret buying
__________________
Oooooh Cecil, what have you done? |
26-03-2008, 16:46 | #6 |
Combat Spanker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,292
|
Yep, installments too! Such a nice bloke!
Durz, didnt you sell yours to Pebs? If that was yours, I had a play with it last time we were down there No fnar intended |
28-03-2008, 01:53 | #7 |
'09 sexual conquests: 4.5
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,075
|
I've got one of them on loan as well at the moment. Can't really fault the quality of it, but it just doesn't have enough reach for me on a full frame body
F/4 isn't great for low light either. I really want the 2.8 version, but it's a lot more expensive. For that price though I'd bite his arm off |
30-03-2008, 02:31 | #8 | |
I'm going for a scuttle...
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,021
|
Quote:
Starscream, low light you say? |
|
30-03-2008, 10:08 | #9 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nr Liverpewl
Posts: 4,371
|
I'd still go for the f/2.8 Theres "low light" and theres low light which I was shooting in the other day. I was limited to f/2.8 and couldn't get sharp enough shots.
__________________
Thats no hamster, its a space station! |
31-03-2008, 09:37 | #10 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 2,345
|
damn you!!!!
a mate of mine is about to pick up one of these for like £600 (student loan day!!) I want one!! £240 is a joke! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|