31-01-2010, 14:29 | #161 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 3,201
|
Not without buying an accessory to stand it up with you can't, it'd be flat on the surface and you'd have to walk over to it to see it
__________________
|
31-01-2010, 16:38 | #162 | |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
My point was that non-tech types don't know they need to worry about it. As such, that argument carries very little weight. We know it's a non-issue only the iPad - they just don't care.
Quote:
Secondly, a large percentage of those Apps will be subscription services (certainly will if Rupert Murdoch gets his way). There's a big unknown right there - how many people will be prepared to pay when you can just fire up a browser and point it at BBC, or CNN, or Digg? Basing sales of the iPad on the print industry might just be asking for trouble - but it's one of those where we both could be right, or wrong. |
|
31-01-2010, 20:42 | #163 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nr Liverpewl
Posts: 4,371
|
Like a book then My parents have a stand for holding up cooking books that the iPad would happily sit on. Much nicer than clearing space for a netbook Ner ner
__________________
Thats no hamster, its a space station! |
31-01-2010, 21:05 | #164 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
My thinking exactly. Thought I'd posted those thoughts too but obviously I didn't. Book stand would be rather more stable to boot.
|
31-01-2010, 22:04 | #165 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nr Liverpewl
Posts: 4,371
|
__________________
Thats no hamster, its a space station! |
31-01-2010, 22:47 | #166 |
Bananaman
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Liverpool/Edinburgh
Posts: 4,817
|
Everyone saying that holding an iPad is similar and as "easy as" a book are totally missing the fact the iPad will weight a fair but more than most books and definately magazines you're used too! A stand will work yes, but just holding it whilst sitting around "relaxing" on the couch i dont think will be very comfotable! Whereas these silly netbooks have a stand buiuld in using old technology called a "hinge".
/Sarcasm |
31-01-2010, 22:53 | #167 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nr Liverpewl
Posts: 4,371
|
__________________
Thats no hamster, its a space station! |
31-01-2010, 22:57 | #168 | |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Quote:
For average Joe user, New World may very well turn out to be king, but it might yet not be Apple's New World. There's this annoying pest called Google who have a somewhat different vision. PS - maybe if they put the big friendly words 'DON'T PANIC' on it, we'd be getting somewhere. Last edited by Mark; 31-01-2010 at 23:01. |
|
31-01-2010, 23:03 | #169 | |
Moonshine
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nr Liverpewl
Posts: 4,371
|
Quote:
Its funny really. When was the last time you saw someone bitch about the Xbox 360 being locked down, running MS approved apps only and you didn't have the freedom to run stuff in the background? You can't use twitter while gaming. The Wii only lets you run approved apps in the way Nintendo deem acceptable. Why should the iPad conform to your traditional standards of what a computer should be? PS3, PS2, PS1, Xbox, Xbox 360, Wii, PSP, Nintendo DS etc all don't. Is that because we've accepted them as consoles not computers?
__________________
Thats no hamster, its a space station! |
|
31-01-2010, 23:22 | #170 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Yup, for the most part, though even there it's a bit of a grey area, because not everyone accepted that. For example, you can run Linux on a PS3, Homebrew on a DS, and so forth.
I 'get' the New World argument for Joe user. It clearly works for the most part - though there's clearly some flaws to work out (Sat Nav getting interrupted by phone calls on the iPhone for one). Still not convinced about the iPad mind - for Joe, a Netbook will do most the same things they want, even if it is decidedly Old World. It is, however, one case where I'm happy to be proved wrong - and probably will be. Last edited by Mark; 31-01-2010 at 23:25. |