16-12-2008, 16:06 | #11 | |
Vodka Martini
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beverley
Posts: 749
|
Quote:
Here's a list of firefox security vulnerabilities: http://www.mozilla.org/security/know...firefox30.html Let's not get hung up on any of these as they're not MS though. |
|
16-12-2008, 16:10 | #12 | |
Vodka Martini
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beverley
Posts: 749
|
Quote:
I've tried IE8 and I didn't like it much with many many sites completely broken and the need to run it virtually all the time in IE7 compatability mode. Hopefully they'll fix it all before launch. There's certainly things wrong with it as there is Firefox (which I felt was completly broken at the launch of version 3) and the other browsers. I just feel this is sensationalist BBC reporting against an easy target. |
|
16-12-2008, 17:42 | #13 | |
Long Island Iced Tea
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 274
|
It would be nice if Windows Update didn't insist on using MSIE.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
16-12-2008, 18:17 | #14 |
Vodka Martini
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 833
|
Don't hold your breath. I imagine more and more SaaS apps to be deployed on the IE platform and as a result, it will maintain its position, for many years yet, as the corporate choice; and try convincing an organisation who rely on Sharepoint and products such as MS Dynamics that they should use FF or Opera.
__________________
|
16-12-2008, 18:36 | #15 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Indeed, a real shame but very true. We have several internal Web 2.0 SaaS-type packages that struggle to work on anything but IE - one is our timesheet package and the other is our main project planning package. They do both sort of work on non-IE, but with annoyances that mean I just end up going back to running them on IE again.
If we, as a software house, struggle with this sort of issue, you can bet that less tech-centric companies than us just don't bother trying. |
16-12-2008, 20:52 | #16 | |
Vodka Martini
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Beverley
Posts: 749
|
Quote:
The extra security (InPrivate Browsing was the only really good thing I took from Beta 1) isn't a bad thing either. |
|
18-12-2008, 00:11 | #17 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
And the fix is out, for those so inclined...
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec.../ms08-078.mspx Already been offered it on at least one machine by Windows Update. |
18-12-2008, 01:51 | #18 |
BD Recruitment Officer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Smogville
Posts: 3,880
|
I'll give it to them, they're quick.
|
18-12-2008, 04:12 | #19 |
Moonshine
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 3,201
|
Well, 7 days since they initially acknowledged it on their site, where they implied they already knew about it before then.
Not bad but still room for improvement.
__________________
|
18-12-2008, 08:35 | #20 |
Vodka Martini
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingston
Posts: 862
|
Forgive me for being totally uninformed, but i've always wondered this:
Is one of the reasons so many security flaws are found in windows software because more people actually look for them? By that i mean, as windows is the dominant operating system and IE the dominant internet browser, if someone wants to cause some havoc then designing an exploit/virus for those platforms is the way to go. Surely OSX, Linux, Firefox etc do have places where they could be exploited too? I don't believe those guys have managed to create completely secure software, but then i've also never heard of an OSX virus or a Firefox exploit so maybe i'm just wrong? All that aside, IE is a pants internet browser anyway
__________________
PSN & Live! ID: Streeteh |