19-01-2009, 22:20 | #11 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,023
|
Thanks for the very useful info Burble!
Couple of quick questions: 1. Does that copy software allow you to take an image of the original disk and then restore it to the new one, if you can't connect both at once? It's not entirely clear from the site. 2. With a larger disk, does Anytime take the same amount of space (i.e. 140GB-ish), or is it a percentage of the total size? Out of interest, I know the HD boxes are made by a few different manufacturers now, but are they all physically identical - i.e. made to Sky's spec?
__________________
Last edited by Toby; 19-01-2009 at 22:35. |
19-01-2009, 23:16 | #12 | |
Absinthe
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 2,539
|
Quote:
STB pricing is very competitive and as a manufacturer we always ensure that there is no 'fat' on the STB. It may sound daft to spend a several man months refining a board to design to save $1 per STB but when you are building several million units a year those savings suddenly seem very worth while. Quite simply a cover isn't fitted because it isn't required. You void the warantee the moment you open the case and the manufacturer/Sky are saving over a million $ a year by not fitting a cover to the PSU. |
|
20-01-2009, 11:14 | #13 | |
Rocket Fuel
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,826
|
Quote:
2 - I think it's a fixed size rather than a percentage of the drive so it should still be about 140Gb. I'm a bit grumpy about that tbh as I have anytime turned off so would have liked to be able to use that 140Gb for my own recordings. I've no idea about the different versions, mine is one of the first generation boxes, made (I think) by Pace. |
|
20-01-2009, 11:15 | #14 |
Rocket Fuel
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,826
|
|
22-01-2009, 09:42 | #15 | |
Absinthe
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,023
|
Quote:
The Anytime stuff is a total joke tbh - Sky's attempt to con their customers into thinking they have genuine VoD when it's nothing of the sort. I still believe the long term future is VoD for everything where the broadcasters will "release" programmes according to a schedule but viewers will then be able to stream them down to their boxes on demand as and when they see fit. I really can't see where such systems would leave Sky as they have no way of implementing this. I think the original boxes were made by Thompson but I could be wrong.
__________________
|
|
22-01-2009, 10:30 | #16 |
Rocket Fuel
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,826
|
|
23-01-2009, 19:34 | #17 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Turns out my Sky+ was still working only because Sky ****ed up. Fixed now. I'll be opening it up at some point to pull the existing disk. Whether I bother putting a new one in depends on whether I bother going back to Sky in the summer.
|