Are they sure this person is from Labour?

[Streeteh]

Originally Posted by Feek

What on earth does religion have to do with this?

Absolutely bugger all, i would have asked the same question as you but realized i couldn't be bothered.

[cleanbluesky]

Originally Posted by Feek

What on earth does religion have to do with this?

Religion was incidental to the comment I made about his role under the Labour party, so you tell me why the comment sent your moral compass spinning...

[Feek]

It wasn't me who brought up the religion subject, I'd be interested to know why you felt it was relevant. You must have thought so or you'd not have mentioned it in the first place.

[Slinwagh]

So we will soon have another convicted Peer who has served time in prison sitting in the House of Lords overseeing law and policy in the UK.

[Mark]

Originally Posted by cleanbluesky

Religion was incidental to the comment I made about his role under the Labour party, so you tell me why the comment sent your moral compass spinning...

The question - which you obviously failed to spot - is why you even thought it necessary to mention religion in the first place, let alone political persuasion (which is also, I might add, incidental).

[cleanbluesky]

Originally Posted by Feek

It wasn't me who brought up the religion subject, I'd be interested to know why you felt it was relevant. You must have thought so or you'd not have mentioned it in the first place.

It seems to be far more important to you than I, it was incidental to my comment. If you're trying to imply something please state it.

[cleanbluesky]

Originally Posted by Mark

The question - which you obviously failed to spot - is why you even thought it necessary to mention religion in the first place, let alone political persuasion (which is also, I might add, incidental).

That wasn't a question, because there was no direct question. If thats YOUR question, I'll answer.

I didn't think it necessary to state his religion. Why should I need a reason to supply a documented fact on the man? Do you highlight the fact because you find it controversial? If so, please state that.
Also, I didn't find it necessary to state his political persuasion, its stated in the article. I made a comment on his character, that of a stooge, and it was a valid comment.

[Feek]

Originally Posted by cleanbluesky

If you're trying to imply something please state it.

Sure.

You seem to bring religion up pretty much whenever and wherever you can. In fact I'd go as far as to say that you seem to be obsessed by it and it's very obvious by anyone with half a brain cell that you're incredibly anti-Muslim. I'm sure I'm not the only one who has noticed this in your posts.

[cleanbluesky]

Originally Posted by Feek

Sure.

You seem to bring religion up pretty much whenever and wherever you can. In fact I'd go as far as to say that you seem to be obsessed by it and it's very obvious by anyone with half a brain cell that you're anti-Muslim. I'm sure I'm not the only one who has noticed this in your posts.

I am anti-Islam, that is to say that I have done an investigation into Islam and I dislike many aspects of it largely due to militarism within Islamism and human rights issues in sharia and the Koran. Not particularly controversial given that Islam prides itself on its values, not information that's particularly hard to find either.
I made a single incidental comment on his religion, and have merely answered questions so it seems I am not the driving force behind bringing religion into this thread.
I do comment on religion in other threads, although only where I think it needs comment and where that comment has not been made by other people.

[cleanbluesky]

I've been informed that the reference I have made earlier was, in fact, unneeded. Therefore I shall comment that Lord Ahmed usually speaks up regarding issues of the religion that dare not speak its name.