09-07-2010, 20:02 | #11 | |
Long Island Iced Tea
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 214
|
Quote:
Don't quote me on this, the Olympus appears to have this feature built in, and perhaps mean cheaper lenses? Still reading around and plenty of information to take in. But I do appreciate all inputs including hands-on experience and views. Thanks.
__________________
"Never ignore fools in large numbers." Last edited by ElRazur; 09-07-2010 at 20:36. |
|
09-07-2010, 20:35 | #12 |
Noob
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Socialist Republik of Kent
Posts: 5,032
|
You don't really need image stabilisation. Remember the camera is a LOT faster than any compact. I don't have it at all on mine and I can't say I've ever needed it. Maybe on longer range lenses, but they have it built in anyway.
__________________
|
10-07-2010, 01:09 | #13 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
If you want in-body IS, then that brings in the Sony Alpha range, which also offer live view.
That said, I'd personally discourage use of live view. The viewfinder will be better than anything you've used on a compact, and using it helps with composure and encourages you to hold the camera correctly. I also considered it a must-have when I got my DSLR, but I only use it when I have to (i.e. when I can't see clearly through the viewfinder, or can't use the viewfinder at all). As for IS, yes, it's useful, and yes, in-body IS tends to be cheaper, and obviously works on most lenses (won't say all just in case there's an exception). That said, in-lens IS can be optimised for the lens and can also give better results. Cleaning systems won't help you keep lenses clean. They're for the sensor and are of limited use. Taking care when changing lenses is the best thing you can do to keep the sensor clean. |
10-07-2010, 07:33 | #14 | ||
Stan, Stan the FLASHER MAN!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In bed with your sister
Posts: 5,483
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Just because I have a short attention span doesn't mean I... |
||
10-07-2010, 11:03 | #15 |
Bad Cat
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 808
|
I have a Canon 1000D. I didn't buy it so I don't need to defend it
It has Live View but I don't use it (even as a speccy four eyes), I've started to get used to the viewfinder again after 8 years of not using them. IS is on the lenses not the body, you are correct. It has sensor cleaning. Massive range of lenses being a Canon. Excuse the utterly crap post structure, just about to go out!
__________________
NO |
03-08-2010, 19:18 | #16 | |
Long Island Iced Tea
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 214
|
Hey people, here is one of the final short-list I am looking at
http://www.jessops.com/online.store/...7947/show.html Quote:
Anything brand or make out there than can match this in terms of feature and price? Planning on purchase end of August.
__________________
"Never ignore fools in large numbers." |
|
03-08-2010, 20:06 | #17 |
Baby Bore
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 9,770
|
It's a good camera, what you will find is that there isn't the wealth of accessories and additional lenses that you would get with Canon and Nikon but the Sony cameras are good
MB |
03-08-2010, 22:11 | #18 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
The α300 was a serious contender when I was weighing up options. In fact, it was a close second to the 450D I got (I preferred the viewfinder on the 450D, otherwise I could very well be a Sony owner now).
What Matt said is true - many, many more accessory options for the 'big two', but Sony has a good range and "G" series lenses are often considerably cheaper than their Canon L counterparts. Big problem though - the α300 was discontinued some time ago, so unless Jessops have some secret stock squirreled away or you happen upon a store with stock, you're probably out of luck. Last edited by Mark; 03-08-2010 at 22:14. |
04-08-2010, 10:37 | #19 |
Long Island Iced Tea
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 214
|
Thanks guys.
The A300 is still in stock in most Jessops stores for pick up only. Gosh, buying a camera is a nightmare. Too many stuff to pick from, and it just get confusing. In terms of accessories, is there any way to find a list of how the major manufacturers performs? So we have Canon and Nikon on top, how does Pentax compare? As it stand, I am looking at Pentax K-x and in comparison with one of the Sony A390 (similar to the A300) it was rated as better. It also appears to perform better than the offerings from Canon and Nikon too. http://snapsort.com/compare/Pentax_K...lpha_DSLR-A390 Anyone had any experience with the Pentax Dslr range?
__________________
"Never ignore fools in large numbers." |
04-08-2010, 22:00 | #20 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Might have had a play with one - there were five on my shortlist - Panasonic, Sony, Canon, Nikon, and one other, which I think was Pentax. If so, it got dropped off my list pretty quickly as I didn't think much of the look and feel.
That said, any DSLR should be a big leap forward over a P&S if properly used. So it's down to features, handling, accessories etc. In terms of accessories, Pentax have a fairly long history. Sony don't (but they 'bought' some so it's not as bad as that statement might seem). In the end, it's personal choice. Get what's right for you. |