12-10-2007, 10:30 | #11 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 2,345
|
i can only suspect it is - i've never really understood that particular figure - the rest is pretty easy to get ur head around, but that - aint a clue.
|
12-10-2007, 10:32 | #12 |
Chef extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Infinite Loop
Posts: 11,143
|
well it seems the new phillips ones are 4500:1 but I thought most TVs were 1000:1 + but not has high as that shows how much I know
__________________
"Dr Sheldon Cooper FTW!" |
12-10-2007, 10:34 | #13 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 2,345
|
well i got the pdf off my g/f's dad who is MD @ goldtec so i don't think he'd publish any false details.
*edit* just had a quick look over currys tvs and 5000:1 seems average tbh - few higher, one or two lower... Last edited by Joe 90; 12-10-2007 at 10:36. |
12-10-2007, 10:36 | #14 |
Chef extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Infinite Loop
Posts: 11,143
|
I'm not saying he is, I just didn't think the LCD's went that high that was all. Seems like a good deal to me, is that 1080p?
__________________
"Dr Sheldon Cooper FTW!" |
12-10-2007, 10:45 | #15 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 2,345
|
no, sorry, didn't mean to say you were - just wanted to clarify the source as its obviously not a currys style link and goldtec are hardly a well known high street brand! lol
indeed it is wouldn't buy any less |
12-10-2007, 10:48 | #16 |
Chef extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Infinite Loop
Posts: 11,143
|
that isn't a bad price then for a 1080p set.
Didn't realise they were 5000:1 Haven't looked at TVs for a while
__________________
"Dr Sheldon Cooper FTW!" |
12-10-2007, 11:20 | #17 |
Reverse SuBo
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 8,673
|
*Is not really looking at the TV thread*
honest! BB x |
12-10-2007, 11:36 | #19 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Samsung are quoting contrast ratios up to 25,000:1 on their newest range of TVs. 4,500:1 isn't a problem.
|
12-10-2007, 11:42 | #20 |
The Last Airbender
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pigmopad
Posts: 11,915
|
You have to watch some of the contrast figures. The way they measure them isn't always a true reflection of performance. It has something to do with taking a minimum and maximum and working out an average or something, can't quite remember.
It's a bit like when AMD started the XP1400+ when it was really only 1200MHz system.
__________________
|