03-08-2009, 00:00 | #21 |
Bananaman
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Liverpool/Edinburgh
Posts: 4,817
|
Without getting into my age old argument i love and cherish MediaMonkey has autoplaylists which work much much better (more options much more control) than smart playlists ever would have (apple wouldnt allow anyone that much control!). My autoplaylists are made up of other autoplaylists then all auto synced to my iPod whenever i connect, which means i can have access to LOADS of songs in the overall massive autoplaylist in one go, or whittle is down depends on a loads of factors (of my own choosing).
Anyway forget it i know i'm flogging a dead horse |
03-08-2009, 06:38 | #22 | |
ex SAS
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: JO01ou
Posts: 10,062
|
Quote:
I do exactly the same as you, smart playlists and then other smart playlists based on other smart playlists on set criterion. The list of things that can be used to make the smart playlist is huge! I reckon both programs now have similar functionality and each probably have their own plusses and minuses. Here's a small section of one of my smart playlists, note the scrollbar, if I scroll up and down there are about double the number of rules that you can see controlling the list... Now I must go to work. Great new job I've got in "Bob's horse flogging factory"
__________________
Last edited by Feek; 03-08-2009 at 08:19. |
|
03-08-2009, 08:17 | #23 |
BBx woz 'ere :P
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,147,487,208
|
I don't create all this playlist crap I just select all, press on "random" and just click on next if I don't like the song. Furthermore I have many thousands of songs that are not tagged and I'm definitely not bothered about tagging them all either
__________________
No No! |
03-08-2009, 15:55 | #24 | |
Bananaman
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Liverpool/Edinburgh
Posts: 4,817
|
Quote:
Yeah feekles that's actually pretty damn similar then, but it's been a whiiiile now since i've used iTunes so i guess times are changing! |
|
03-08-2009, 16:38 | #25 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Windows = Winamp or MediaMonkey (see Alex, sometimes people do listen).
Mac = iTunes /discussion |
03-08-2009, 16:39 | #26 |
The Stig
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swad!
Posts: 10,713
|
Linux?
__________________
apt-get moo |
03-08-2009, 16:39 | #27 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Code your own.
I don't have a Linux choice. It's be pointless as my Linux box doesn't have any speakers connected. |
03-08-2009, 17:00 | #28 |
Bananaman
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Liverpool/Edinburgh
Posts: 4,817
|
Amarok on linux probably, although i have very little experience myself, i probably wouldn't be able to get the sound working unless it worked out the box
And mediamonkey is based off winamp anyway |
03-08-2009, 18:02 | #29 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
Yes, I noticed. Just deciding whether to pay for a copy.
|
04-08-2009, 14:16 | #30 |
Bananaman
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Liverpool/Edinburgh
Posts: 4,817
|
Defo get gold and you can get it for free, sign up to one of the trailpay things like emusic it gives you an instant 3.x key and you can cancel your subscription without paying anything in your 7 day trial 100% free no hassle no fuss and you get to keep the key I've done it a few times (except i used lovefilm and they were a bit more of a hassle at cancelling but it worked out anyway).
|