06-03-2008, 15:23 | #21 |
Chef extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Infinite Loop
Posts: 11,143
|
I just don't understand the point of a 17.5" laptop Anything over say 15" is just to big to be portable. 13" is probably around the ideal size. We had some new 17" Acer machines at work here the other week and they were ridiculous.
__________________
"Dr Sheldon Cooper FTW!" |
06-03-2008, 15:45 | #22 |
I iz speshul
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 6,296
|
Ours is 17", but then it was bought so that Lynne could have it downstairs doing work while watching TV. Portability was never a concern for us.
__________________
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine as children do. It's not just in some of us; it is in everyone. And as we let our own lights shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others. |
06-03-2008, 16:05 | #23 |
Do you want to hide in my box?
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,941
|
15" is what I'm after really. Although it won't be moved far, I'd still like it to be vaguely portable even if it's just around the house.
There's a decent Vostro on hotukdeals today but I don't have the money yet :/ Damn me for looking early
__________________
Halycopter |
06-03-2008, 16:28 | #24 |
Bananaman
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Liverpool/Edinburgh
Posts: 4,817
|
17" is still FAR more portable than any computer or comparable performace ever will be Leo! Yes you won't take it everywhere with you, but it can be easily and all in one moved from room to room house to house to work etc... All in its bag all self contained, think of it as more like a luggable than a portable. But they do make sense in the right situations.
Haly the Vostro are EXCELLENT laptops for their money My bro just scored one for his birthday off my rents and i'm VERY impressed with it! |
06-03-2008, 17:39 | #25 |
Do you want to hide in my box?
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,941
|
They look good And seem to be great prices.
Roll on payday
__________________
Halycopter |
06-03-2008, 18:59 | #26 |
Sofa Boy
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wield of the Shire
Posts: 701
|
I was speccing a Vostro earlier today for a friend. They are impressively good value for money.
Intel® Core™ 2 Duo Processor T5470 (1.60 GHz, 800 MHz FSB, 2 MB L2-cache) Genuine Windows® XP Professional - English 15.4" Wide Screen WXGA (1280 x 800) Display with TrueLife™ 2048MB 667MHz Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM (2x1024) 120GB (5400rpm) SATA Hard Drive 128MB nVidia® GeForce® 8400M GS Fixed Internal 8X DVD+/-RW Drive Primary 6-cell Lithium-Ion Battery (56 WHr) 1Yr Basic Warranty - Next Business Day Included - No Upgrade Selected Comes to £404.20 inc VAT (delivery is free until 20th March) |
06-03-2008, 19:28 | #27 |
Do you want to hide in my box?
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,941
|
Near identical to what I was looking at earlier Just went for a slightly faster processor for a bit extra. Otherwise exactly what I want
I'm going to stick with XP, just don't see the point in Vista yet and I've got a legal Vista license floating around somewhere anyhow.
__________________
Halycopter |
06-03-2008, 19:55 | #28 |
The Stig
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swad!
Posts: 10,713
|
If you can afford it, and there's an option too, look at upgrading the screen resolution to whatever it is in the 1400xwhatever region. People often overlook the screen but its the part of the laptop you'll use above all others!
__________________
apt-get moo |
06-03-2008, 19:57 | #29 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
1440x900.
The next one up on Dell systems tends to be 1680x1050 (which is what I got - even though I actually run it at 1440x900 on a monitor and 1280x800 when mobile). Dell's current generation 1920x1200 screens seem to be plagued with backlight bleeding issues so best avoided (not that I'd recommend going that high on a 15in screen anyway). |
06-03-2008, 20:04 | #30 |
Bananaman
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Liverpool/Edinburgh
Posts: 4,817
|
Yeah, listen to Daz, my 1280 * 800 can be painful sometimes, but most of the time when i need the extra room i've got my monitor plugged in to the right of me. On the move i take the screen space hit because generally on the move i'm not trying to get a million and one things done that need that sort of room!
|