22-09-2008, 16:14 | #41 | |
Baby Bore
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 9,770
|
Quote:
MB |
|
22-09-2008, 16:16 | #42 |
Old Git
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,016
|
bugger
|
22-09-2008, 16:17 | #43 |
Baby Bore
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Svalbard
Posts: 9,770
|
MB |
22-09-2008, 18:26 | #44 |
Long Island Iced Tea
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 442
|
See the M3 is on the drive, you sold it yet?
|
22-09-2008, 20:27 | #45 |
Old Git
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,016
|
not yet, listed on on pistonheads, mtorque and autotrader, see how that goes
|
28-09-2008, 14:40 | #46 | |
Absinthe
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,247
|
Quote:
Is the 355 as chuckable or light on its feet as an Elise? Of course not. It is, however, a vastly superior product.....and I've driven lots of them. |
|
28-09-2008, 17:48 | #47 |
The Night Worker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,228
|
Now that is just being Greedy +
Good effort matey, Red line it for me won't you |
28-09-2008, 18:43 | #48 |
BBx woz 'ere :P
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,147,487,208
|
I love the Cayman S - I had a spin (and a cheeky drive of one) in one earlier this year. Much more fun than the 911, but a bit more grown up than the Boxster. Great purchase! One day... one day....
__________________
No No! |
28-09-2008, 19:30 | #49 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,247
|
The Cayman is far better looking than the Boxster, which is a hideous car from the 'B' pillar to the rear of the car.
|
28-09-2008, 19:35 | #50 |
BBx woz 'ere :P
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,147,487,208
|
I disagree, there are some nicely kitted boxster s around which are incredibly good cars (from a handling point of view, sharp chassis, responsive and communicative - and surprisingly easy to deal with considering the weigh distribution) - but I guess it's a marmite thing - but I tend to like the look of cars that most people don't
__________________
No No! |