Boat Drinks  

Go Back   Boat Drinks > General > General Disruption

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17-05-2010, 20:00   #51
Nutcase
Moonshine
 
Nutcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chelmsford, innit!
Posts: 3,979
Default

Great Stick that in yer pipe and smoke it!
Nutcase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2010, 20:26   #52
Burble
Rocket Fuel
 
Burble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,826
Default

I wouldn't celebrate yet, Unite are expected to be back in court tomorrow to attempt and get the decision reversed.

Either way, I'll be taking the Al Italia flight (volcano permitting of course) on Friday rather than the BA flight and in future won't be using BA.
Burble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2010, 20:27   #53
A Place of Light
Absinthe
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmc41 View Post
British Airways has won a High Court injunction to stop the latest strikes by its cabin staff.

HA HA HA
A strike like this has the potential to start the death throes for BA. Protesting is one thing, but doing it like this couldn't be more counter productive.
A Place of Light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2010, 20:28   #54
Mark
Screaming Orgasm
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
Default

Volcano forecast looks promising. Colleagues heading off to Sofia (Bulgaria) tomorrow so I checked for them earlier.

As for the BA situation, it's a short-term reprieve. Unite will just keep on balloting until BA run out of injunctions to throw at them. Meanwhile passengers vote with their feet because it becomes impossible to predict what will fly and when. Net result - the jobs Unite think they're defending no longer exist. Hate the term, but nonetheless, epic fail on both sides.

Last edited by Mark; 17-05-2010 at 20:31.
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2010, 20:33   #55
A Place of Light
Absinthe
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burble View Post
in future won't be using BA.
I think this is an opinion held by a lot of potential customers, which will do nothing but feed the vicious circle.
They strike, they get their deal then the company has lost so many customers due to the way they conducted their action that it needs fewer staff to operate so the job losses begin.

30 years ago this would've been the norm, but now???
A Place of Light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2010, 20:35   #56
jmc41
Absinthe
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,070
Default

I'm slightly concerned about the ash too; my parents are currently stuck is some huge hotel in the middle of nowhere outside Madrid waiting for another flight after todays got cancelled.

I agree there will be another ballot and eventually it'll go ahead. Unless BA manages to get risk of them by then, either way another great example of a companies employees removing their own jobs (Royal Mail is the other).
jmc41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2010, 21:04   #57
Mark
Screaming Orgasm
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
Default

Royal Mail workers settled. Of course, they might decide that was a bad idea in two years.
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2010, 21:09   #58
Burble
Rocket Fuel
 
Burble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,826
Default

I have a very simplistic view on this sort of thing. It's unskilled work so finding replacement staff isn't going to be hard. Any that strike should get the sack. We would all like our work conditions improved but we're not all about to hold the company and the general public to ransom to get what we want.
Burble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2010, 21:17   #59
Mark
Screaming Orgasm
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
Default

BA have - well, at least a few of them. Naturally, the Union spat their dummy over that, too.
Mark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2010, 22:17   #60
jmc41
Absinthe
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark View Post
Royal Mail workers settled. Of course, they might decide that was a bad idea in two years.
Aye, eventually I think a lot of companies found alternatives in the end and I don't image all switched back. Could be wrong, either way royal mail is a dying brand and the only question is... how long.

I agree with Burble, fire the lot of them. Then they'll have the right number of staff and won't need to make any cuts
jmc41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:45.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.