18-09-2008, 13:43 | #51 |
Abandoned Ship
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 492
|
If the case is merely that groups have organised themselves to apply for something that anyone can achieve and that there is no existing policy for the government to deny them - then I'd say the situation was fair, although a review should be considered on the basis of this case. If its the case that sharia courts have been approved by a government body who have the right to turn them down on whim, then I think that these courts are a definite step in the wrong direction.
Either way I don't think we have enough information about the process to confirm it |
18-09-2008, 13:46 | #52 | |
Long Island Iced Tea
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 106
|
Quote:
Knowing these provisions, and without any information on the contrary, I think it is reasonable to assume the situation is as I, and others, have described.
__________________
Oderint Dum Metuant |
|
18-09-2008, 13:57 | #53 |
Screaming Orgasm
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newbury
Posts: 15,194
|
I haven't read the law, but that's always the way I'd read it. I'm also not sure what a review could accomplish. Barring the courts 'because they practice Sharia' certainly wouldn't go down well. It would also seem that equality legislation doesn't apply - otherwise there would already be sufficient grounds for appealing these rulings.
|