10-06-2009, 13:56 | #61 |
Provider of sensible advice about homosexuals
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Posts: 2,615
|
I'd go with the idea of a retest every 10 years or some other similar period as a lot can change within that sort of timescale - it doesn't necessarily have to be along the same lines as a driving test with rigid focus on "safe" driving practice (feeding wheel through hands etc) but certainly for hazard perception and adequate observation.
__________________
"Your friend is the man that knows all about you, and still likes you." - Elbert Hubbard |
10-06-2009, 19:16 | #62 | |
Absinthe
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,247
|
I'd still choose 5 year intervals over ten.....and include a compulsory eye test as well. You're senses can wane significantly in five years never mind ten. How about a compromise?
Every ten years until you're 40 then every five years after that? Quote:
|
|
13-06-2009, 10:28 | #63 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,070
|
In terms of old drivers I certainly have some doubts about, for example my 85 year old grandfather passing. I thought they already had a re-test at a set age though? Mine is apparently valid (from June 01) to September 52 the day before my 70th birthday!
And that's a differnet date to the date on the front that suggests I need a new image after 3 years or so. Tests every x years might weed out some of the more dubious drivers; but I'm concerned it'd add yet more costs into what is already extraordinarily expensive. |
13-06-2009, 12:05 | #64 | |
Absinthe
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,247
|
Quote:
I'd gladly pay an extra £40 or so every five years if it meant that people who shouldn't even be on the roads were forced back upto standard. |
|