18-02-2009, 14:10 | #81 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 2,539
|
£700k for rights to the Wedding
I'm really not sure how I feel about this. Part of my finds it disgusting that she is using the illness to get all this money but another part say's "fair play" as she is getting the money to set her children up when she is gone. In all fairness to the girl I'd probably do the same thing in her situation. |
18-02-2009, 14:11 | #82 |
Do you want to hide in my box?
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,941
|
If I thought it'd help set my kids up with a decent education and life, I know I'd do it.
Doesn't seem disgusting in the slightest to me.
__________________
Halycopter |
18-02-2009, 14:22 | #83 | |
Absinthe
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 2,539
|
Quote:
Thinking a bit more "disgusting" is the wrong word, I'm really not sure what is but the whole situation makes me feel very uncomfortable. P.S. As you're all lovely people I'm sure a few of you will want to offer your condolences on the passing of my Aunt. While I would appreciate the sentiment it really isn't necessary as I don't get upset about things like that. |
|
18-02-2009, 19:31 | #84 | |
Absinthe
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,247
|
Quote:
This. |
|
18-02-2009, 19:33 | #85 |
Absinthe
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,247
|
|
18-02-2009, 19:37 | #86 | |
Absinthe
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,247
|
Quote:
I'd guess that any parents on here would agree with you on that score. IMHO she's doing nothing more than playing the media at it's own game. If they're daft enough to pay those sums of money then she's going to take those opportunities with both hands. |
|
18-02-2009, 21:33 | #87 |
Vodka Martini
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 833
|
I wrote this elsewhere and I think it establishes my position, such as it is.
Apologies for it sounding a little harsh - the context is a bit different (and I don't actually have anything against JG herself)... "I don't care whether it's with her consent or not and nor do I care that it's all for her kids' sake. Giving people a load of cash does not "set them for life". Responsible, loving parenting does that and she's potentially saddling them with the future guilt that she prostituted her own suffering simply to provide them with money. If I were in her situation I'd like to think that my kids wouldn't wish for my progress towards oblivion to be splashed all over the tabloids. She shouldn't allow the media to exploit her in such a way; the media shouldn't exploit her in such a way; and finally, the British public should not indulge either JG or the media. You'd think there was enough redundancy built in there to prevent what will become a media circus from happening; and perhaps the fact that it's still, somehow, happening regardless, is a sign of how debased our society has become."
__________________
|
18-02-2009, 21:40 | #88 |
'09 sexual conquests: 4.5
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,075
|
I'd say she's exploiting the media rather than the other way round tbh.
It's part of a parents nature to want to provide for their kids. Jade's not exactly going to write an opera to do it, so this is the best way she can achieve it. It's like anything with the tabloids anyway, you can't really blame the people they feature. There's a big market for trash because a very high percentage of the public are idiots. Therefore, it sell newspapers by the bucketload. Fair play to her, IMO. |
18-02-2009, 21:47 | #89 |
Vodka Martini
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 833
|
If the media weren't making cash they wouldn't be interested. They are exploiting each other; but that doesn't make it right.
__________________
|
18-02-2009, 21:54 | #90 |
'09 sexual conquests: 4.5
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,075
|
But if she's aware of it and plays on it to get what she wants, isn't that her exploiting them. I'm sure she isn't naive.
|