23-08-2007, 19:35 | #11 |
Provider of sensible advice about homosexuals
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Posts: 2,615
|
AMD aren't dead in the water so to speak but Intel have reclaimed the number one position by (for the first time in a while) having a CPU that is clearly ahead on performance/overclockability and competes well on price. I suspect some of the problem for AMD stems from their purchase of ATI and a bit of a loss of focus.
If I can then I prefer to buy AMD because it is the smaller company and deserves support (to keep Intel vaguely honest if nothing else) but at the moment Intel chips are where my money would be going.
__________________
"Your friend is the man that knows all about you, and still likes you." - Elbert Hubbard |
24-08-2007, 09:21 | #12 |
Stan, Stan the FLASHER MAN!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In bed with your sister
Posts: 5,483
|
Personally, I would like to see AMD make a comeback soon. I like them because they fought their way into the market with a superior product even though the odds were stacked against them and I'd like to see them do the same again.
Having said that, Intel most certainly have the upper hand at the moment with the Core series. Recent price cuts can only boost their market share - unless AMD come up with something special fairly soon. With the top of the range Core 2 Duo, the E6850 at less than £180, a Core 2 Quad, the Q6600 only a fiver dearer and at the bottom of the range, the E2140 (which will, allegedly, overclock from 1.6GHz to 3.0GHz with ease - although the 1Mb L2 cache shared between the two cores cripples it a bit) at less than £50 it's hard to see why anyone building a completely new system would choose anything else.
__________________
Just because I have a short attention span doesn't mean I... |
24-08-2007, 09:31 | #13 |
ex SAS
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: JO01ou
Posts: 10,062
|
I'm the same, I go with whatever is best for me at the time. My last system was AMD and ATI which progressed to AMD and Nvidia and has now changed to Intel/Nvidia.
__________________
|
24-08-2007, 09:50 | #14 |
I iz speshul
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 6,296
|
Same Current rig is AMD/ATI, while the next will be Intel/Nvidia (the first Nvidia card I've owned I think). I just go with what's best at the time for what I can afford
__________________
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine as children do. It's not just in some of us; it is in everyone. And as we let our own lights shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others. |
24-08-2007, 10:31 | #15 |
Stan, Stan the FLASHER MAN!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In bed with your sister
Posts: 5,483
|
Same here.
Up until recently, I swore by AMD/ATI and all of my folding rigs (including my gaming rig) were built using that configuration. My main gaming rig is now Intel/Nvidia and I will only switch if AMD/ATI release components superior to those I'm using at the moment.
__________________
Just because I have a short attention span doesn't mean I... |
24-08-2007, 10:38 | #16 |
The Stig
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Swad!
Posts: 10,713
|
See I've always preferred nVidia simply because they've always had superior Linux support. Hoping that might change though now ATI are AMD, they're quite good open source supporters.
__________________
apt-get moo |
24-08-2007, 10:43 | #17 |
Stan, Stan the FLASHER MAN!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: In bed with your sister
Posts: 5,483
|
I found that when I dabbled with Ubuntu recently, the Nvidia drivers were a doddle to work with whereas, I never did get the ATI drivers to work any sense.
__________________
Just because I have a short attention span doesn't mean I... |